Skip to main content

Security report for farnostfulnek.cz

Římskokatolická farnost Fulnek · Non-profit · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Římskokatolická farnost Fulnek is a small non-profit religious organization serving the Fulnek community in the Czech Republic. The website provides parishioners and visitors with information about religious services, announcements, events, and church tours. The site is built on WordPress and uses several plugins to enhance user experience, including sliders and portfolio galleries. The target audience is local parishioners and visitors interested in church activities. The organization has maintained the domain since 2010, reflecting a stable presence in the community. Technically, the website employs a standard WordPress infrastructure with common plugins such as Smart Slider 3 and Visual Portfolio. The site is hosted with a Czech registrar and uses HTTPS, ensuring secure communication. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization, though accessibility and SEO could be improved. Analytics are implemented via Google Analytics, but no visible cookie consent or privacy policy is present, indicating compliance gaps. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data. However, it lacks security headers and a formal privacy or cookie policy, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident. The domain registration details are consistent and legitimate, supporting the site's trustworthiness. Overall, the website is functional and professional for its purpose but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices to improve user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching farnostfulnek.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The parish operates as a local non-profit religious entity focused on community engagement through religious services and events. Its market position is localized with no commercial intent. The business model centers on providing spiritual and community services rather than revenue generation. The website supports this by offering announcements, event calendars, and multimedia galleries. Partnerships with regional church tourism and diocesan sites are evident through external links. Growth indicators include regular content updates and event promotions. The organization maintains a straightforward digital presence with limited marketing or monetization strategies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is enforced, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No forms or user input fields are present on the main page, minimizing attack surface. The lack of a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism indicates compliance gaps with GDPR. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder timely security issue resolution. Overall, the site is low risk but should adopt additional security best practices to enhance protection and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident response.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and reach.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Římskokatolická farnost Fulnek
Registration number
159996671/0300
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Římskokatolická farnost Fulnek
Description
Roman Catholic parish providing religious services, announcements, event information, and community engagement for Fulnek area.
Key services
Religious services (Bohoslužby), Parish announcements (Aktuálně), Church tours (Prohlídka kostela), Event calendar (Kalendář), Photo galleries (Fotogalerie)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Smart Slider 3, Visual Portfolio plugin, Google Charts, YouTube Embed Plus, DataTables
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of updated libraries and plugins

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based parish site with religious and community content.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided in the footer.
  4. Use of multiple plugins for galleries, sliders, and calendar events.
  5. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking without visible cookie consent.
  6. No visible security headers detected in the HTML content.
  7. No forms detected on the main page; no user input fields found.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  9. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL configuration.
  10. No signs of malware, phishing, or suspicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a combination of popular plugins for sliders, portfolios, and calendar events. The tech stack includes PHP, jQuery, and Google Charts for data visualization. Hosting is provided by a Czech registrar with DNS servers at nethost.sk and nethost.eu. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. Performance is moderate with lazy loading and responsive design implemented. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected, but security headers are missing. The site architecture is typical for a small non-profit organization with a focus on content delivery rather than complex functionality.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with farnostfulnek.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review farnostfulnek.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.