Skip to main content

Security report for falck.fi

Falck · Transportation · Finland

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Email security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Falck is a well-established company providing travel assistance services primarily targeting travelers seeking safety and emergency support during their journeys. The website is professionally designed with good localization in Finnish and includes comprehensive cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. The technical infrastructure leverages modern analytics tools such as Microsoft Application Insights and Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and telemetry monitoring in place, though some security headers and explicit security policies are not visible in the analyzed content. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, serving a large audience in the transportation and healthcare sectors in Finland.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching falck.fi

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
75
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Falck operates in the transportation and healthcare sectors, focusing on travel assistance and emergency services. The business model centers on providing service-based support to travelers, likely generating revenue through service contracts and assistance fees. The company maintains a consistent brand presence across multiple country domains, as evidenced by cookie information referencing various Falck country sites. The partnership ecosystem includes technology providers like Microsoft and Citrix, supporting their digital operations. Growth indicators include the use of advanced analytics and compliance with privacy regulations, positioning Falck as a competitive player in its market niche.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enabled and the use of Microsoft Application Insights for monitoring and telemetry. The cookie consent banner is detailed and GDPR compliant, reflecting good data protection practices. However, the absence of visible security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The security score is high but could be enhanced by implementing additional security headers and publishing explicit security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information, including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility on the website to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Falck
Description
Falck provides travel assistance services aimed at ensuring safe travel experiences. The website content is focused on travel aid and related services.
Key services
Travel assistance, Emergency support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Microsoft Application Insights, Google Tag Manager, Citrix, ASP.NET
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Application Insights for monitoring
  • Cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Application Insights, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Application Insights
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed cookie information per country domain.
  2. Use of modern analytics and tag management tools.
  3. No visible contact information or security policy pages found on the analyzed page.
  4. No terms of service page detected in the provided content.
  5. Website is well localized in Finnish language with proper metadata and Open Graph tags.
  6. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including JavaScript, Microsoft Application Insights, Google Tag Manager, Citrix, and ASP.NET components. The HTML includes proper meta tags for SEO and social media sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDN-hosted resources. There is no detected CMS from the provided content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience with room for optimization in security headers and explicit technical documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with falck.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review falck.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.