Skip to main content

Security report for fairfuturechallenge.nl

Stichting DOEN · Non-profit · Netherlands

High risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Fair Future Challenge website is a professionally designed platform operated by Stichting DOEN, a Dutch non-profit organization funded by the Postcode Loterij and VriendenLoterij. The site promotes a challenge aimed at supporting sustainable and social entrepreneurs in the Netherlands, offering financial prizes and networking opportunities. The website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and uses modern web technologies including Google reCAPTCHA for form security. Privacy and cookie policies are clearly presented, demonstrating GDPR compliance. The domain is newly registered in 2024, consistent with the challenge's timeline, and the WHOIS data shows no suspicious activity. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and secure form handling, though some security headers could be improved. Overall, the site reflects a trustworthy and credible non-profit initiative with a clear mission and professional execution.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: RDP

      Port 3389 (RDP) is publicly accessible - RDP - Remote Desktop, prime ransomware target

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to RDP using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fairfuturechallenge.nl

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
68
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention fairfuturechallenge.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for fairfuturechallenge.nl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Stichting DOEN positions itself as a key enabler for sustainable and social entrepreneurship in the Dutch market. The challenge targets startups and scale-ups with consumer-facing sustainable or social products or services. The business model is non-profit, focusing on grants, investments, and community building. Partnerships with established entities like Postcode Loterij and Impact Hub Amsterdam enhance credibility and reach. The website content and structure support effective communication of the challenge's criteria, timelines, and benefits. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a controlled communication channel via the contact form and Starthubs platform. The organization demonstrates a clear growth and impact strategy through events like the Product Fair and jury selection process.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration, uses Google reCAPTCHA v2 and v3 to protect forms from abuse, and avoids exposing sensitive data in the HTML. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy are not evident, which could be enhanced to mitigate clickjacking and other web attacks. The domain lacks DNSSEC, which is recommended for DNS security. No known vulnerable libraries or scripts were detected. Incident response and security policies are not published, which is common for non-profit informational sites but could be improved for transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but can be strengthened with additional headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and security.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stichting DOEN
Description
Stichting DOEN organiseert de Fair Future Challenge om impactvolle ondernemers met duurzame en sociale producten en diensten te ondersteunen. Het doel is een circulaire economie en een inclusieve samenleving. Het fonds biedt financiële steun, connecties en een communicatieplatform aan voorlopers die het verschil willen maken.
Key services
Financiële steun (subsidies, leningen, investeringen), Netwerk en connecties, Communicatieplatform, Organisatie van challenges en events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google reCAPTCHA v2 and v3, Froala Editor styles, Swiper.js slider
Platforms
Starthubs platform for user accounts and login
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Dutch language
  2. Focus on a sustainable and social entrepreneurship challenge
  3. Strong branding and partnership with Stichting DOEN and Postcode Loterij
  4. Use of modern web technologies and security best practices
  5. Clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed, only contact form
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  8. No visible vulnerabilities or suspicious external domains
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and integrates Google reCAPTCHA for form security. It leverages the Starthubs platform for user account management and login functionality. The site includes responsive design elements and uses Swiper.js for sliders. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and optimized images via a CDN (imagedelivery.net). The CMS is not explicitly identified but appears custom or integrated with Starthubs. Accessibility is basic, and SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site uses minimal external analytics or tracking services, focusing on privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for optimization in accessibility and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fairfuturechallenge.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fairfuturechallenge.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.