Skip to main content

Security report for fahrrad-schill.de

Fahrrad Schill · Transportation · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fahrrad Schill is a small local bicycle retailer and service provider based in Germany, specializing in sales and maintenance of bicycles including E-Bikes and children's bikes. The website is built on WordPress using the Gutenberg editor and Go-X theme, providing a modern and responsive user experience suitable for local customers. The site is well-structured with clear navigation and professional branding, although it lacks advanced privacy and security policies. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but could be improved by adding security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image for a small business but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fahrrad-schill.de

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the transportation sector focusing on bicycle sales and services. Its market position is that of a local specialist shop serving customers in Neresheim and Dorfmerkingen. The business model is retail and service with additional offerings like leasing and insurance. The website targets local customers and families, emphasizing quality service and product range. There is no indication of large scale operations or subsidiaries. The company maintains a consistent brand image and provides essential contact points, although explicit contact details like phone numbers or emails are not clearly presented on the site.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options which could mitigate common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited security maturity. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the absence of cookie consent and privacy policy details reduces compliance with GDPR standards. The site should implement security best practices and provide clear security and incident response information to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO optimization for better user experience and reach.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fahrrad Schill
Description
Fahrrad Schill is a local bicycle business in Neresheim, Dorfmerkingen, offering sales, service, and repair of bicycles including E-Bikes, children's bikes, and youth bikes. They provide leasing and insurance options as well.
Key services
Bicycle sales, Bicycle service and repair, Leasing and insurance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gutenberg, Go-X theme/plugins, GLightbox
Frameworks
Gutenberg
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small local business site for bicycle sales and service.
  2. Content is in German and targeted at local customers.
  3. No advanced security or privacy policies found.
  4. No cookie consent or tracking detected.
  5. Site uses WordPress with Gutenberg and Go-X theme/plugins.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. WHOIS data is minimal but consistent with a small business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Gutenberg and uses the Go-X theme and plugins, indicating a modern CMS platform. It employs GLightbox for media display. The site is mobile responsive and loads with moderate performance. No advanced hosting or CDN information is available. The technical implementation is standard for small business websites but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. There is no evidence of tracking or analytics services, which may limit marketing insights but improves privacy. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate but could be enhanced with performance optimization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fahrrad-schill.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fahrrad-schill.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.