Skip to main content

Security report for fafi.fi

Fashion Finland ry · Retail · Finland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fashion Finland ry is a Finnish non-profit industry association dedicated to enhancing the visibility, appreciation, and business support of the fashion sector in Finland. The organization actively promotes collaboration and the culture of fashion through member services, events, and information dissemination. The website serves as a professional platform targeting fashion industry professionals, businesses, and interested consumers within Finland. It provides news, trends, event information, and membership details, positioning itself as a key player in the Finnish fashion ecosystem. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and integrates advanced search capabilities via Algolia. It employs Google reCAPTCHA for form security and uses Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. Hosting is inferred to be with OVH based on nameservers. The site is mobile-optimized, SEO-friendly, and demonstrates good performance and accessibility standards. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses CAPTCHA to protect forms, and does not expose sensitive data. While some security headers are not explicitly detected, the overall posture is strong with no evident vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy and transparency of the organization, matching the website's claims and business nature. Overall, Fashion Finland ry's website is a credible, well-maintained digital presence that effectively supports its mission and audience. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and adding a vulnerability disclosure channel to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fafi.fi

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
28
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fashion Finland ry operates as a non-profit association within the Finnish fashion retail and media sectors. It leverages membership services, industry promotion, and event organization to support its stakeholders. The organization benefits from a clear market position as a central industry body, with a focus on collaboration and cultural promotion. Its business model is service-oriented, targeting fashion professionals and companies in Finland. The website's integration with Microsoft Forms for membership applications and active social media presence indicates a modern approach to engagement and growth. The association's partnerships with web development and hosting providers reflect a professional operational ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms, and no visible exposure of sensitive information. Security headers could be improved by explicitly implementing CSP, X-Frame-Options, and other recommended headers. There is no evidence of malware, phishing, or vulnerabilities in the visible code. Privacy compliance is strong with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent. Incident response and security policy documentation are absent, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the site balances usability and security effectively for its non-profit context.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Fashion Finland ry
Registration number
1521095-9
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fashion Finland ry
Description
Fashion Finland pyrkii kasvattamaan muotialan näkyvyyttä ja arvostusta, tukemaan liiketoimintaa sekä edistämään yhteistyötä ja muodin kulttuuria Suomessa.
Key services
Industry visibility and promotion, Member services and benefits, Collaboration facilitation, Event organization, Information dissemination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.9.13, Bootstrap 4.3.1, jQuery 3.6.0, Algolia Search, Google reCAPTCHA, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (inferred from WordPress plugins)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Algolia Search
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is in Finnish with some English and Swedish pages
  3. Clear navigation with multiple categories and member services
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  5. Active social media presence linked (LinkedIn, Instagram)
  6. Secure forms with Google reCAPTCHA integration
  7. WHOIS data shows a registered non-profit organization with consistent details
  8. No suspicious or malicious indicators found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap 4.3.1 for responsive design and jQuery 3.6.0 for client-side scripting. It integrates Algolia for advanced search functionality and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. Analytics and marketing are managed via Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. Hosting is likely provided by OVH, inferred from nameservers. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs and uses modern SEO practices including structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The site is mobile-friendly and has a clear navigation structure, supporting good user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fafi.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fafi.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.