Skip to main content

Security report for f-list.at

F/LIST · Transportation · Austria

High risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Network security.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

F/LIST is a well-established Austrian family business specializing in luxury interior outfitting for business jets, private jets, and high-end living spaces such as hotels. The company emphasizes craftsmanship, innovation, and premium materials, positioning itself as a global leader in the luxury interiors market. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with multilingual support and rich content tailored to its affluent target audience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and libraries, hosted on Hostinger with LiteSpeed server technology. However, the security posture is weakened by the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of modern TLS protocol support, which critically impacts secure communications. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism and a clear privacy policy. Contact information is transparent and includes multiple channels, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires urgent security improvements to meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching f-list.at

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
75
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
18
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the luxury transportation and hospitality sectors, focusing on bespoke interior design and manufacturing. Its business model revolves around high-value custom projects for jets and residential spaces, supported by a global presence and a strong heritage dating back to 1950. The website supports recruitment efforts via dedicated career portals and maintains transparency through whistleblowing and certification disclosures. The marketing ecosystem includes Facebook Ads and Google Analytics, indicating active digital marketing and user behavior tracking. The company leverages social media platforms to engage with its audience and enhance brand visibility. The domain registration and DNS setup are consistent with the company's Austrian roots and business claims, supporting legitimacy and trust.

Security posture

The website implements several important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, indicating awareness of security best practices. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent critical vulnerabilities that expose users to potential data interception and undermine trust. The absence of DNSSEC and CAA records further reduces domain security. No known vulnerabilities or malware were detected in the content or scripts. Forms use Contact Form 7 with validation and redirection, but without explicit mention of additional security controls like CAPTCHA or anti-spam beyond standard plugins. Incident response contact channels exist via whistleblowing and general contact emails, but no dedicated security policy or incident response page was found. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and install a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user data.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated versions.
  3. Implement DNSSEC and CAA records to enhance domain security and certificate issuance control.
  4. Enhance XSS protection by enabling X-XSS-Protection header or equivalent modern mechanisms.
  5. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact channels.
  6. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.
  7. Improve accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  8. Consider adding CAPTCHA or advanced anti-spam measures on contact forms.
  9. Maintain transparency on data retention policies related to analytics and cookies.
  10. Continue to monitor and update cookie consent mechanisms to comply with evolving regulations.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.4.5 running on PHP 8.1.31 with a LiteSpeed server hosted by Hostinger. It uses popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization, Contact Form 7 for user inquiries, Cookie Law Info for GDPR compliance, and Weglot for multilingual support. Frontend technologies include Swiper.js for sliders and Video.js for media playback. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance metrics are not explicitly provided but the use of caching (cache-enabler-engine) and lazy loading images suggests optimization efforts. However, the lack of valid SSL and disabled TLS protocols pose significant technical risks. The site uses multiple external domains for social media, careers, and whistleblowing services, indicating a well-integrated digital ecosystem.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with f-list.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review f-list.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.