Skip to main content

Security report for expeditors.com

Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. · Transportation · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. is a global logistics company specializing in freight forwarding, customs brokerage, and supply chain management services. The company operates a comprehensive worldwide network and offers technology-enabled solutions to optimize logistics operations. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence targeting businesses requiring global transportation and supply chain services. Technically, the site uses ASP.NET and is hosted behind Cloudflare with integrations such as Google Tag Manager and HubSpot for marketing and analytics. However, the security posture is weakened by the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of TLS protocol support, which is a critical vulnerability. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, with consent mechanisms in place. Overall, the site is functional and credible but requires urgent improvements in SSL/TLS security to protect user data and maintain trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching expeditors.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
65
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention expeditors.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
15,559
Employees
22
Customers
1,348
Third parties
14,189
Weak passwords
2%

Latest record dated 2026-06-10 · 45 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for expeditors.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –login.expeditors.com2026-06-10
  • –idp.expeditors.com2026-05-26
  • –insite.expeditors.com2026-05-24
  • –webmail.expeditors.com2026-05-21
  • –login.expeditors.com2026-05-15

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Expeditors holds a strong market position as an enterprise-level transportation and logistics provider. Their business model focuses on integrated supply chain solutions, leveraging technology and consultancy services to differentiate from competitors. The company targets large businesses with complex logistics needs across multiple industries. The website content and social media presence support a mature marketing strategy. No suspicious or inconsistent WHOIS data was found, reinforcing legitimacy. The absence of explicit security policies or incident response contacts suggests an area for improvement in transparency and trust. The company uses modern marketing tools and tracking services, indicating digital maturity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates partial adherence to security best practices with several important HTTP security headers configured. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent a critical security gap, exposing users to potential data interception and undermining trust. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response information was found, which could hinder timely security issue reporting. The SPF DNS record uses dynamic macros which may cause email authentication issues. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires immediate remediation to meet industry standards and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure all communications.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable legacy protocols.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  4. Review and correct SPF DNS record to remove dynamic macros and ensure proper email authentication.
  5. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on ASP.NET technology and hosted behind Cloudflare, providing CDN and security services. It uses Google Tag Manager and HubSpot for analytics and marketing automation, along with Microsoft Clarity for user behavior tracking. The HTML content is well-structured with responsive design elements for mobile optimization. However, performance metrics are unavailable, and SSL/TLS configuration is critically lacking. The site includes multiple forms for shipment tracking, location search, and login, but no direct email or phone contact details are embedded in the HTML. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features are basic but present.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with expeditors.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review expeditors.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.