Skip to main content

Security report for exclusivecollection.com

RE/MAX Exclusive Collection · Real Estate · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RE/MAX Exclusive Collection is a well-established luxury real estate agency serving the Central Florida region with over 30 years of experience. The company leverages the global RE/MAX network to provide comprehensive real estate services including luxury home listings, market reports, mortgage assistance, and personalized agent support. The website reflects a professional and user-friendly platform designed to facilitate property searches and client engagement. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies such as Vue.js, Bootstrap, and integrates with Google Maps and analytics tools, ensuring a responsive and interactive user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and monitoring tools in place, though there is room for improvement in security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. Overall, the site demonstrates a high level of business credibility and digital maturity, supporting its market position as a premier real estate service provider in its region.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching exclusivecollection.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets affluent home buyers and sellers in Central Florida, focusing on luxury properties. Its business model centers on brokerage services combined with a robust online listings platform. The presence of detailed agent profiles and integration with MLS data enhances customer trust and engagement. Partnerships with platform providers like Inside Real Estate indicate a strategic approach to technology adoption. The company maintains a strong social media presence to support marketing and client outreach. Growth indicators include active listings, subscription alerts, and mortgage services, positioning the firm competitively within the regional luxury real estate market.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security posture with HTTPS encryption and the use of monitoring tools such as New Relic. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a potential area of vulnerability. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks a published security policy or incident response contact, which could improve transparency and readiness. Forms appear to be standard with validation, but no advanced anti-bot or multi-factor authentication mechanisms were observed. Overall, the security measures are adequate but could be enhanced to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Introduce a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency regarding tracking.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to prevent vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
RE/MAX Exclusive Collection
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RE/MAX Exclusive Collection
Description
We are one of the premiere luxury real estate agencies in Central Florida with over 30 years servicing the Orlando, Winter Park, Windermere, and surrounding cities. In conjunction with the global reach of RE/MAX, our local team provides the knowledge and expertise needed to ensure a smooth experience when navigating through a real estate transaction.
Key services
Luxury home search, Instant listing alerts, Home value estimation, Mortgage pre-approval assistance, Local market reports, Real estate agent services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Maps API, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, New Relic Browser monitoring
Frameworks
Bootstrap, Vue.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security monitoring (New Relic)
  • No exposed credentials or sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, New Relic Browser, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag), Facebook Pixel, New Relic Browser
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, New Relic
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional real estate agency site focused on luxury properties in Central Florida
  2. Multiple agent profiles with detailed bios and photos enhance trust
  3. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  4. No explicit cookie consent banner found despite tracking scripts
  5. Contact information is clearly presented including phone and address
  6. Security headers could be improved
  7. No visible security or incident response policy
  8. Social media presence is strong with Facebook, Instagram, YouTube links
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Vue.js for reactive components, Bootstrap for responsive design, and jQuery for legacy support. It integrates Google Maps API for location services and uses Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, ensuring good performance and scalability. Analytics and marketing tools include Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and New Relic for monitoring. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive layouts and accessible navigation. Technical debt appears low with no broken elements detected. Opportunities exist to improve SEO and accessibility compliance further, as well as to enhance security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with exclusivecollection.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review exclusivecollection.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.