Skip to main content

Security report for everyaction.com

Bonterra · Non-profit · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bonterra is a leading provider of nonprofit software solutions focused on social impact, offering products for fundraising, case management, corporate social responsibility, and grant management. Founded in 2021, Bonterra has quickly established itself as the second-largest social good software company globally, serving a diverse audience including nonprofits, foundations, corporations, and government agencies. The company emphasizes a 'better together' approach, integrating multiple social good solutions under one brand. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript frameworks like React and uses WP Engine hosting with Cloudflare CDN. While the site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, the security posture is weakened by an invalid SSL certificate and lack of modern TLS protocol support, which are critical issues to address. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies, and the site uses extensive marketing and analytics tools. Overall, Bonterra presents a professional and trustworthy online presence but should prioritize fixing SSL and TLS issues to enhance security and user trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of everyaction.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching everyaction.com

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bonterra operates in the nonprofit technology sector, targeting organizations that require specialized software for fundraising, case management, and CSR programs. Its business model is SaaS-based, offering multiple integrated products such as EveryAction, Network for Good, and CyberGrants. The company leverages partnerships and acquisitions to expand its product portfolio and market reach. The presence of multiple login portals and product-specific URLs indicates a complex ecosystem serving various customer segments. Bonterra's client base includes prominent organizations like Audubon and Pfizer, signaling strong market credibility. The company’s growth is supported by a comprehensive resource hub, training academy, and active social media engagement, positioning it well for continued expansion in the social good software market.

Security posture

The website implements several security best practices including a comprehensive Content Security Policy, strict transport security headers, and protections against content sniffing and cross-site scripting. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols significantly undermine the security posture, exposing users to potential risks during data transmission. The lack of OCSP stapling and session resumption further impacts security and performance. No explicit incident response or security policy pages were found, indicating potential gaps in transparency and readiness. The extensive use of third-party scripts necessitates ongoing vulnerability management. Overall, while some security headers are well configured, critical SSL/TLS issues must be remediated urgently to ensure secure user interactions.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately renew and correctly configure the SSL certificate to enable HTTPS.
  2. Enable and enforce modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) to secure data in transit.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  4. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Bonterra LLC
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform, utilizing React for frontend components and GSAP for animations. It employs Bootstrap 5 for responsive design and Max Mega Menu for navigation. Hosting is provided by WP Engine with Cloudflare CDN for content delivery. The site uses multiple marketing and analytics tools including Marketo, Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Performance is moderate with lazy loading images and responsive design, but SSL/TLS misconfiguration impacts overall security and user trust. The site demonstrates good SEO practices with comprehensive meta tags and structured data. Technical debt appears low, but SSL/TLS issues represent a critical risk to business operations and customer confidence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium2 findings · partial scanView report
  2. 77/100Low24 findingsView report
  3. 77/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with everyaction.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review everyaction.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.