Skip to main content

Security report for evektor.com

Evektor · Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Evektor is a Czech-based company specializing in aircraft development and mechanical engineering services, with a strong focus on manufacturing EASA certified aircraft and providing engineering solutions across various industries. The company holds significant certifications such as EASA certification, AS9100D, and type certificates for specific aircraft models, positioning it as a reputable player in the aviation and manufacturing sectors. Their website showcases a professional digital presence with detailed information about their products, services, and certifications, targeting aviation professionals, flight schools, and engineering clients. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Typeform for user engagement and data collection. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, some security best practices such as security headers and explicit incident response policies are not publicly documented. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and implements cookie consent for privacy compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which should be verified to ensure trustworthiness. Overall, Evektor's website reflects a mature business with a solid technical foundation and compliance posture, though improvements in transparency around security policies and domain registration verification are recommended to enhance trust and security assurance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching evektor.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Evektor operates in the transportation and manufacturing sectors, focusing on aircraft production and engineering services. Their market positioning is strengthened by recognized certifications and a portfolio of EASA certified aircraft, targeting flight schools, aviation clubs, and industrial clients. The business model combines direct manufacturing with subcontracting and engineering services, supported by a professional online presence and active marketing through social media and analytics tools. Growth indicators include recent fleet orders and participation in industry events. The company maintains partnerships and dealer networks but no explicit subsidiary or parent company relationships were identified. Strategic observations suggest a focus on quality certifications and digital modernization projects funded by the EU, indicating a forward-looking operational approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. However, the lack of visible security headers and absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response page indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were found in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts for analytics and marketing is managed with user consent, reducing privacy risks. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern that impacts overall trust and should be addressed. Incident response readiness and data protection officer contact information are not publicly available, which could be a compliance gap for certain regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration information to ensure transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide more detailed data retention policies to improve privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Evektor
Description
Evektor performs complete aircraft development and operates in various engineering sectors as a supplier of end-to-end solutions.
Key services
Aircraft manufacturing, Engineering services, Industrial automation, Manufacturing subcontracting, Rapid prototyping, Computational analysis, Design & development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Typeform, Weglot (translation), jQuery
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Pixel
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Typeform
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. No WHOIS data available, domain registration status unclear.
  3. Strong presence of certifications and trust indicators.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented with GDPR compliance.
  5. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  6. Multiple external tracking and marketing scripts used with consent.
  7. Contact form uses embedded Typeform widget.
  8. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found in the HTML content.
  9. Social media presence includes LinkedIn, Facebook, and YouTube.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, integrating modern JavaScript libraries and third-party services such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Typeform for analytics and user interaction. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile-optimized with responsive design. SEO is well addressed with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from additional security hardening measures. No hosting provider information was explicitly found. The use of Weglot indicates multilingual support, enhancing global reach. Overall, the technical stack supports a professional and functional online presence with room for security and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with evektor.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review evektor.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.