Skip to main content

Security report for eveautosports.lv

EVEautosports · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EVEautosports is a small-scale event organizer focused on automotive and motorcycle tourism rallies primarily in the Saldus region of Latvia. The website serves as a portal for event announcements, registrations, results, and news updates related to motorsport events such as the 'Līgo Saldus 2025' rally and the Kurzemes Ziemas Kauss 2025 series. The target audience includes families, friends, and motorsport enthusiasts interested in regional rally events. Technically, the website employs modern front-end technologies including Bootstrap, Google Fonts, and JavaScript libraries for UI enhancements. The site is mobile-optimized with a responsive design and clear navigation, though it lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML content. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and privacy or cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy verification. No forms or sensitive data collection points were detected, reducing immediate risk exposure. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok supports community engagement. Overall, the website is functional and serves its informational purpose well but would benefit from enhanced security practices, privacy compliance documentation, and improved transparency regarding business and domain registration details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eveautosports.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EVEautosports operates in the niche market of regional motorsport event organization in Latvia, focusing on tourism rallies that combine adventure and local cultural experiences. Their business model revolves around event promotion, participant registration, and publishing event results and news. The company leverages partnerships with local sponsors and community organizations, as evidenced by the displayed partner logos. The target customer segments include motorsport enthusiasts, families, and local communities. Growth indicators include regular event updates and active social media channels. However, the lack of detailed business registration and contact information limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is basic and lacks several best practices. The site does not display security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which are important to mitigate common web attacks. There is no visible privacy or cookie policy, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing the attack surface. The site uses HTTPS (assumed from URL), but SSL configuration details are unknown. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers, publish privacy documentation, and conduct a security audit.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration and regularly monitor certificate validity.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to the website to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incident reporting.
  5. Conduct a full security assessment and vulnerability scan to identify and remediate potential risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EVEautosports
Description
EVEautosports appears to be an organizer or promoter of automotive and motorcycle tourism rallies and events, primarily in the Saldus region of Latvia. The website features event announcements, results, registration information, and news related to motorsport events such as the 'Līgo Saldus 2025' rally and the Kurzemes Ziemas Kauss 2025 series.
Key services
Tourism auto/moto rally event organization, Event registration, Publishing event results and news
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap CSS, Bootstrap Icons, AOS (Animate On Scroll), GLightbox, Swiper, Google Fonts (Roboto, Poppins, Nunito)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and content is fully loaded.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the main page.
  4. Social media links to Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok are present and active.
  5. No forms detected on the main page HTML content.
  6. No security headers or meta tags related to security found in the HTML.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in the HTML head.
  9. Site uses modern CSS frameworks and fonts but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Google Fonts for typography, and JavaScript libraries such as AOS for animations, GLightbox for lightbox effects, and Swiper for sliders. The site is mobile-optimized and has a clear navigation structure. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or backend technology from the HTML content. Performance appears moderate with no heavy scripts detected. SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data. Accessibility features are limited. There is an opportunity to improve technical SEO, accessibility compliance, and implement analytics for better user insights.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eveautosports.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eveautosports.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.