Skip to main content

Security report for eurostar.com

Eurostar · Transportation · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eurostar is a prominent transportation company specializing in high-speed train services connecting major European cities such as London, Paris, Brussels, Amsterdam, and Cologne. The website serves as the official platform for booking train tickets and holiday packages, targeting general travelers across Europe. The business model focuses on providing efficient and convenient rail travel options, positioning Eurostar as a leading player in the European transportation sector. The website's content and branding are professional and consistent, reinforcing its market position and trustworthiness. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including React and Next.js, with a CMS powered by Sanity. The site demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, supported by structured data and social media integration. Despite the lack of explicit hosting provider information, the infrastructure appears robust and well-maintained. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML content. However, it lacks explicit security headers and publicly available security policies or incident response information. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as WHOIS data, presents compliance and trust concerns that should be addressed to enhance transparency and user confidence. Overall, Eurostar's website is a high-quality, professional platform with strong business credibility and technical maturity. Addressing privacy compliance and security transparency will further strengthen its security posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eurostar.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
90
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
86

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention eurostar.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
12,823
Employees
12
Customers
12,706
Third parties
105
Weak passwords
7%

Latest record dated 2026-06-17 · 23 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for eurostar.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –aria.eurostar.com2026-06-17
  • –aria.eurostar.com2026-06-07
  • –aria.eurostar.com2026-06-04
  • –aria.eurostar.com2025-07-31
  • –aria.eurostar.com2025-07-22

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Eurostar operates in the transportation sector, offering high-speed rail services and holiday packages across Europe. Its competitive advantage lies in connecting key European cities with efficient train travel, appealing to a broad customer base of travelers. The business model is primarily ticket sales and holiday bookings, supported by a strong brand presence and partnerships such as with Thalys. The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern technology adoption and integrated marketing tools. Growth indicators include multi-language support and extensive service offerings. The partnership ecosystem includes related rail services, enhancing market reach and customer convenience.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforcement and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security transparency and best practices. Compliance with GDPR is not clearly evidenced due to missing privacy and cookie policies. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the HTML content. The security culture appears to be focused on user experience and performance but could benefit from enhanced security disclosures and controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration details to ensure domain legitimacy and transparency.
  5. Enhance cookie consent mechanisms to comply with privacy regulations and improve user control over tracking.

Contact details published on the site

Registration number
company number 11005481
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eurostar
Description
Eurostar Official Website. Book your train tickets to London, Paris, Brussels, Amsterdam, Cologne and many more European destinations with Eurostar.
Key services
Train ticket booking, Holiday packages
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, CSS, JSON-LD
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Tealium
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Conductrics, Tealium
Marketing tools
Tealium
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and fully functional
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for a major brand domain
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in provided HTML
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content
  5. Social media links to official Eurostar accounts present
  6. Uses modern web technologies and structured data for SEO
  7. No security policy or incident response information publicly visible
  8. No security headers explicitly detected in HTML content
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content
  10. No WAF or blocking detected, content fully accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a modern tech stack including React and Next.js, supported by the Sanity CMS. It leverages JSON-LD structured data for SEO and integrates third-party marketing and analytics tools such as Tealium and Conductrics. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and demonstrates fast loading times. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced. No major technical debt or legacy technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy compliance disclosures to reduce technical risks and align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eurostar.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eurostar.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.