Skip to main content

Security report for euroship.lv

Euroship Service · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Euroship Service is a specialized subcontracting company focusing on metalworks, primarily shipbuilding and ship repair, with about 20 years of experience. The company offers a broad range of services including steel structures, piping works, painting, blasting, and electrical works, targeting global clients in the transportation and manufacturing sectors. The website presents a professional image with clear service descriptions and contact information, supporting its market position as a reliable industry player. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as Bootstrap for responsive design, Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience, though some SEO and accessibility features could be enhanced. Performance is moderate, with no critical technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and reCAPTCHA but lacks explicit security headers and privacy/cookie policies, which are important for compliance and trust. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy verification, slightly reducing trustworthiness. No vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected in the site content. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from improved privacy compliance, enhanced security headers, and transparent domain registration data to strengthen trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching euroship.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Euroship Service operates as a subcontractor in the shipbuilding and metalworks industry, serving clients worldwide. Its competitive advantage lies in its 20 years of specialized experience and certifications from major international Classification Societies. The business model focuses on providing comprehensive metalwork services including ship repair, steel structures, piping, painting, and electrical works. The company targets industrial and maritime sectors, positioning itself as a reliable and skilled partner. The website reflects a consistent brand and professional approach, though it lacks detailed corporate information such as founding year or parent company data. The presence of multiple contact channels and project showcases indicates active client engagement and a solid partnership ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. It employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from spam and ensure secure communication. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense-in-depth. No explicit privacy or cookie policies are present, which may lead to compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file indicates limited incident response transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, but the site would benefit from implementing recommended security best practices and improving privacy compliance to enhance its security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Improve SEO and accessibility features to enhance website reach and usability.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Euroship Service
Description
Euroship Service is a subcontracting partner specializing in metalworks, primarily shipbuilding and ship repair for about 20 years, also providing services in steel structures, piping works, painting, blasting, and electrical works.
Key services
Shipbuilding & ship repair, Steel structures, Piping works, Painting and blasting, Electrical works
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform), FontAwesome (implied by icon usage), JavaScript ES6+, CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form spam protection
  • HTTPS usage implied by origin-trial meta tag referencing https URLs

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with company emails, phone numbers, and physical address in Latvia.
  4. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates tracking but no explicit privacy compliance notices.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  7. Website content is professional and relevant to shipbuilding and metalworks industry.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, GSAP for animations, Owl Carousel for sliders, and Google services for analytics and spam protection. The HTML structure is valid and supports mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of JavaScript assets. However, the site lacks advanced SEO meta tags and accessibility features such as ARIA roles or landmarks. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could be improved with enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with euroship.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review euroship.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.