Skip to main content

Security report for europark.lv

EUROPARK LATVIA · Transportation · Latvia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Europark Latvia is a medium-sized transportation service provider specializing in parking management and payment solutions across multiple Latvian cities. The company offers a self-service portal and mobile app to facilitate parking permit purchases and payments, positioning itself as a leading parking operator in the Latvian market. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact details and social media presence on Facebook. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot for consent management, and Google Maps API for location services. The site is served over HTTPS with basic security best practices, though some security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is addressed through a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, though a dedicated privacy policy page is not explicitly found. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the domain appears legitimate based on content and business information. Overall, the website demonstrates good digital maturity and business credibility with room for improvement in security policies and accessibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching europark.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Europark Latvia operates in the transportation sector, focusing on parking services with a business model centered on service provision to both individual customers and businesses. The company leverages digital tools such as a self-service portal and mobile app to streamline customer interactions and payments. Its market position is strong within Latvia, supported by multiple parking locations and partnerships with major service providers like Google and Facebook for analytics and advertising. Revenue streams likely include parking fees, subscription permits, and app-based payments. The company maintains a clear partnership ecosystem with major advertising and analytics platforms but does not publicly disclose subsidiaries or parent companies. Growth indicators include recent news updates and expansion of parking locations. Strategic observations suggest a focus on digital transformation and customer convenience.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of cookie consent management to comply with GDPR. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks a published security policy or incident response plan, and no security.txt file was found, indicating limited transparency in vulnerability disclosure. Data protection practices are partially addressed through consent mechanisms, but incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident. Compliance gaps exist in formal security documentation and accessibility standards. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve trust.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet recognized standards such as WCAG 2.1 for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Improve SEO and metadata with structured data (JSON-LD) to boost search engine visibility and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
EUROPARK LATVIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EUROPARK LATVIA
Description
Europark Latvia operates parking services including multi-storey car parks and parking lots in various Latvian cities, providing self-service portals and mobile app payment options.
Key services
Parking lot management, Subscription parking permits, Mobile app payments, Self-service portal
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot, jQuery, Flexslider, Google Maps API
Frameworks
Turbolinks
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot session pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot consent management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS and modern tracking and consent tools
  2. Cookie consent is comprehensive and GDPR compliant
  3. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error
  4. Clear contact info with phone, email, and physical address present
  5. No security.txt or explicit security policies found
  6. No signs of malware or phishing
  7. Good integration of Google Maps and self-service portal
  8. Social media presence limited to Facebook
  9. Terms of service available as PDF in multiple languages
  10. No privacy policy page explicitly found but cookie consent references privacy
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of modern JavaScript libraries and APIs including jQuery, Flexslider for UI components, Google Maps API for geolocation services, and Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie management. Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are integrated for user behavior tracking and marketing analytics. The site employs Turbolinks for faster page navigation. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially on mobile devices where the site is well optimized but could benefit from further enhancements. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and accessibility compliance are recommended to reduce operational risks and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with europark.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review europark.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.