Skip to main content

Security report for euronics.com

Euronics · Retail · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Euronics is presented as the largest retail group globally in the consumer electronics sector, operating extensively across EMEA and CIS markets through a network of physical and virtual outlets. The website is professionally designed using Framer and incorporates Google Analytics for user tracking. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data and domain details raises questions about domain legitimacy and registration status. The website lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Security posture is weak due to missing security headers and unclear SSL configuration. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires improvements in security and compliance documentation to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching euronics.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
40
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Euronics operates as an enterprise-level retail group specializing in consumer electronics, targeting a broad general audience across multiple international markets. The business model focuses on retail through both physical stores and online platforms under a global brand and various national brands. The company likely generates revenue through product sales and possibly partnerships with manufacturers. The website's use of modern design tools and analytics indicates a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the lack of transparent domain registration and compliance policies suggests areas for operational improvement. No explicit partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the provided data.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is limited. There is no evidence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which are essential for mitigating common web attacks. The SSL/TLS configuration could not be verified from the data provided. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which limits the organization's readiness to handle security incidents. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking, but without clear privacy disclosures, this may pose compliance risks. Overall, the security maturity appears low to moderate, with significant room for improvement.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add and configure essential security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Verify and publicly disclose domain registration details to improve legitimacy and trust.
  4. Establish and publish vulnerability disclosure and incident response procedures.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and ensure mobile optimization to improve user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Euronics
Description
Euronics is the largest retail group in the world, operating in the majority of EMEA and CIS key markets via an extensive network of physical and virtual outlets under both the Euronics global brand and a variety of strong national historical brands.
Key services
Retail of consumer electronics and appliances
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Framer
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, indicating possible domain privacy or unregistered status.
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the analyzed content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
  5. Uses Google Analytics for tracking.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  7. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  8. Website uses Framer for site generation/design.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the provided content.
  10. Content is professional and relevant to retail electronics.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Framer, a modern web design and prototyping tool, and integrates Google Analytics for tracking user behavior. The technical implementation shows good design quality and mobile responsiveness. However, there is no detected CMS or hosting provider information. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading or errors. The lack of security headers and compliance documentation indicates technical debt in security and privacy areas. There is an opportunity to modernize the security infrastructure and improve compliance through better policy integration and technical controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with euronics.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review euronics.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.