Skip to main content

Security report for esol.cz

eSol.cz s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

eSol.cz s.r.o. is a Czech-based software development studio specializing in custom mobile applications, web development, and comprehensive IT solutions with a strong focus on transportation and geolocation software. With over 25 years of experience in bespoke software development and more than 15 years in transportation solutions, eSol.cz holds a leading market position in this niche. Their key services include native and hybrid mobile app development for Android and iOS, custom web solutions, API-driven complex platforms, and IT infrastructure management including hosting in their own cloud environment. The company emphasizes long-term client relationships and tailored solutions. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and jQuery, uses secure HTTPS connections, and integrates Google reCAPTCHA for form security. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies and missing WHOIS data slightly reduce the overall trust and compliance posture. Security practices are solid with encrypted communications and form protections, but could be improved by adding security headers and incident response disclosures. Overall, the website is professional, well-designed, and trustworthy, serving a specialized business audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching esol.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector with a strong focus on transportation software solutions, leveraging its flagship product EDISX for taxi and courier dispatch services. Their business model revolves around custom software development, hosting, and IT management services, targeting businesses requiring tailored digital solutions. The presence of client testimonials from notable companies like ŠKODA AUTO and EcoTAXI indicates a reputable client base and market trust. The company maintains partnerships with domains such as edispecink.cz and edisx.eu, which are integral to their service offerings. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data suggests privacy protection or domain registration issues, which should be addressed to enhance credibility. The company appears to be small-sized but with a mature and specialized market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from spam and abuse. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content, and form submissions use AJAX with validation. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security hardening. There is no published security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. The missing privacy and cookie policies represent compliance gaps, especially under GDPR. No known vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the frontend stack. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved with additional headers, policies, and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policy pages to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and verify security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add a security policy and incident response page detailing procedures and contact channels for vulnerability reporting.
  4. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet standards and broaden user inclusivity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
eSol.cz s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
eSol.cz s.r.o.
Description
Vývojářské studio zaměřené na tvorbu mobilních aplikací, webů, komplexních řešení a správu IT sítí s provozem ve vlastním cloudu. Má více než 25 let zkušeností s vývojem na míru a více než 15 let zkušeností s řešeními v oblasti přepravy osob, zásilek a geolokace.
Key services
Vývoj mobilních aplikací (Android, iOS, hybridní), Vývoj webových aplikací na míru, Komplexní softwarová řešení s API, Hosting a provoz řešení ve vlastním cloudu, Správa sítí a IT infrastruktury, Provoz mailových služeb s IceWarp, Dodávky hardware a software
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.5.0, jQuery 3.3.1, jQuery Validate 1.19.2, Font Awesome 5.12.0, Ionicons 2.0.1, Linearicons, Lineawesome, Retina.js, Owl Carousel 2.2.1, Magnific Popup, Slider Revolution 5.4.4, IceWarp (mail server technology), .NET (mentioned in content), MongoDB (mentioned in content), B4X (mentioned in content)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web, Android, iOS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on contact forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Contact forms with validation and AJAX submission

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple contact methods.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which may indicate privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  6. Website uses modern frontend technologies and is mobile responsive.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond reCAPTCHA.
  8. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and well-supported technology stack including Bootstrap 4.5, jQuery, Font Awesome, and various icon libraries, ensuring responsive and visually appealing design. The integration of Slider Revolution and Owl Carousel enhances user experience with dynamic content presentation. Hosting is managed internally in their own cloud infrastructure, indicating control over environment and security. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, no CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. The lack of security headers and privacy policies are technical debt areas. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively with room for security and compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with esol.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review esol.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.