Skip to main content

Security report for esignering.no

Ambita AS · Real Estate · Norway

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ambita AS operates the website esignering.no, providing electronic signing and digital identification services primarily for real estate and property-related transactions in Norway. The company positions itself as a secure and efficient alternative to manual signing processes, targeting businesses and individuals involved in property dealings. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a consistent brand presence and a focus on compliance and user trust. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, CKEditor, and jsGrid, alongside Cookiebot for cookie consent management and Piwik Pro for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and offers a secure login form, although some improvements in accessibility and SEO could be made. The cookie consent mechanism is comprehensive, categorizing cookies by purpose and providing detailed information to users. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms but lacks explicit security headers in the HTML content. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is strong, with a clear privacy policy linked and a functional consent mechanism. However, no dedicated security policy or incident response information is found. Overall, the website demonstrates a good security posture and business credibility, with moderate technical implementation and content quality. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, improving accessibility, and adding explicit security and incident response policies to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching esignering.no

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ambita AS holds a solid position in the Norwegian real estate technology sector, offering digital signing solutions integrated with banks and registration authorities. Their business model focuses on providing secure, legally compliant electronic signature services that replace manual processes, targeting real estate professionals and property owners. The company leverages partnerships with related domains and services to expand its ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include subscription or usage fees for signing services. The presence of multiple related domains indicates a broad service portfolio and partnership network. Growth indicators include the adoption of modern web technologies and comprehensive privacy compliance, positioning Ambita as a trusted provider in its niche.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, secure login forms, and a detailed cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. The use of Cookiebot and Piwik Pro indicates attention to privacy and analytics governance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be exploited. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which may limit transparency. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the provided content. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by adopting additional security best practices and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and libraries to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Improve website accessibility compliance to meet WCAG standards for a broader user base.
  5. Enhance SEO by adding structured data (JSON-LD) and optimizing meta tags for better search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Ambita AS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ambita AS
Description
Ambita offers electronic signing services in cooperation with registration authorities and banks, focusing on secure and efficient digital signatures for property-related documents.
Key services
Electronic signature, Digital identification, Document signing solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, CKEditor, jsGrid, Cookiebot, Piwik Pro Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure login form with password field
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik Pro, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Piwik Pro, Hubspot, Zendesk
Marketing tools
Hubspot, Zendesk
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides a secure login form for electronic signing services.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed cookie categorization.
  3. Multiple third-party integrations for analytics, marketing, and customer support.
  4. Clear contact information including physical address, phone numbers, and email.
  5. Privacy policy is linked and appears comprehensive and GDPR compliant.
  6. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
  7. No visible security headers detected in the HTML content.
  8. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks like jQuery, Bootstrap, CKEditor.
  9. Website content is primarily in Norwegian with some English elements in cookie consent.
  10. No signs of WAF or content blocking; full content accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of established front-end technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and CKEditor, providing a responsive and interactive user experience. The integration of Cookiebot for consent management and Piwik Pro for analytics reflects a modern approach to privacy and data tracking. Performance appears moderate, with room for optimization in loading times and resource management. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary platform. Technical debt is minimal based on the HTML content, but improvements in accessibility and SEO are recommended. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but the use of Cloudflare services is implied by cookie providers and scripts. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with opportunities for modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with esignering.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review esignering.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.