Skip to main content

Security report for erwinhymergroup.com

Erwin Hymer Group · Transportation · Germany

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Erwin Hymer Group is a large, established company specializing in leisure and mobility experiences, primarily through manufacturing and distributing leisure vehicles and related services. The website reflects a professional digital presence with a clear focus on its 24 brands and services such as rental, finance, and service. The company targets consumers interested in camping and mobility solutions, positioning itself strongly in the transportation and leisure sector in Germany. Technically, the website uses modern tools including Pimcore CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for compliance, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers and published security policies are lacking. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and GDPR-aligned cookie consent. However, the absence of WHOIS data and explicit contact information slightly reduces overall trust. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and improving accessibility and contact transparency to further strengthen security and compliance. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant with privacy regulations, suitable for its business domain.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching erwinhymergroup.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention erwinhymergroup.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
263
Employees
16
Customers
190
Third parties
57
Weak passwords
10%

Latest record dated 2026-05-12 · 16 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for erwinhymergroup.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –just.erwinhymergroup.com2026-05-12
  • –just.erwinhymergroup.com2026-04-30
  • –just.erwinhymergroup.com2026-04-30
  • –erwinhymergroup.com2026-01-13
  • –.erwinhymergroup.com2025-11-16

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Erwin Hymer Group operates in the leisure and transportation sector with a diversified portfolio of 24 brands. Its business model includes manufacturing, rental, finance, and service offerings, targeting leisure vehicle consumers. The company leverages partnerships and digital tools to enhance customer experience and compliance. The website's use of analytics and marketing tools suggests active engagement in data-driven marketing and customer insights. The lack of visible contact details and WHOIS transparency may be areas for improvement to boost customer trust and regulatory compliance. The company appears to have a strong market position in Germany with a focus on sustainable and responsible business practices as indicated by dedicated sections on environmental and social responsibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and integration of reCAPTCHA to prevent automated abuse. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, providing granular user control and GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and readiness perception. Implementing a security.txt file and publishing clear security policies would enhance trust and preparedness. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from additional hardening and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and improve transparency.
  4. Enhance accessibility compliance to improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Provide clear and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Erwin Hymer Group
Description
With its 24 strong brands, the Erwin Hymer Group unites numerous specialists from the camping sector to provide unique leisure and mobility experiences.
Key services
Manufacturing of leisure vehicles, Rental services, Finance services, Service and maintenance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Pimcore, FontAwesome, Cloudflare (likely for CDN and security), Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Pimcore CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with Cookiebot.
  3. Privacy policy is present and GDPR compliant.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is a concern for domain transparency.
  6. Use of modern technologies and analytics tools indicates digital maturity.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. Website content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Pimcore CMS platform and uses a modern tech stack including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, and reCAPTCHA. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDNs likely via Cloudflare. The site uses SVG icons and modern CSS for styling. There is room for improvement in accessibility and explicit security header implementation. The absence of WHOIS data and registrant information is a technical transparency concern. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and compliant web presence but could be enhanced with additional security and transparency features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with erwinhymergroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review erwinhymergroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.