Skip to main content

Security report for erkosautoskola.lv

ErKos · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ErKos is a small, established driving school based in Liepāja, Latvia, offering a comprehensive range of driver education services including multiple vehicle categories, first aid courses, medical commissions, and vehicle maintenance. The website reflects a professional local business with over 20 years of experience and a modern fleet, targeting individuals seeking driving licenses and related services. The technical infrastructure is built on the Multiscreensite platform, leveraging modern web technologies and CDN hosting for moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms are lacking. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-structured but would benefit from enhanced privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching erkosautoskola.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the transportation sector, focusing on driver education and vehicle services. It maintains a clear market position as a local driving school with a strong emphasis on customer service and flexible payment options. The presence of an online e-school partner domain indicates a hybrid business model combining in-person and remote learning. Contact details and transparent pricing enhance credibility. The company appears to have a stable customer base and a well-defined service portfolio, with potential growth through digital channels.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses reputable third-party analytics and tag management tools. No critical security issues or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers and a privacy policy reduces the overall security maturity. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be improved to enhance security readiness and transparency. The site does not appear to use a WAF or other blocking mechanisms, indicating open accessibility but also potential exposure to threats.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Content-Security-Policy to strengthen security posture.
  3. Establish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure process to facilitate responsible reporting and incident response.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ErKos
Description
Autoskola Liepājā Erkos. Piedāvā iegūt A kategorijas, B kategorijas, C kategorijas un AM, BE, CE kategorijas apliecību. Piedāvā pirmās palīdzības kursus, medicīnisko komisiju, avārijas braukšanas kursus, automašīnu un motociklu apkopi un remontu, kā arī bezprocentu maksājumus un iespēju mācīties ar automātisko pārnesumu kārbu.
Key services
Driving license training for categories A, AM, B, BE, C, CE, First aid courses, Medical commission, Accident driving courses, Vehicle maintenance and repair, E-school (online learning), Flexible payment options
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, skrollr.js, Cloudfront CDN, Multiscreensite platform
Platforms
Multiscreensite CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about driving school services.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy found on the site.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided in footer.
  5. Uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure.
  7. No signs of adult or inappropriate content.
  8. Good mobile responsiveness and navigation clarity.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Multiscreensite CMS platform, utilizing modern web fonts, SVG graphics, and asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. It uses Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, which supports moderate performance and scalability. The site is mobile responsive with a clear navigation structure and good SEO metadata. However, some CSS and JavaScript loading mechanisms could be optimized further for performance. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation support. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with erkosautoskola.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review erkosautoskola.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.