Skip to main content

Security report for erixx.de

erixx GmbH · Transportation · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

erixx GmbH is a regional passenger rail service provider operating in Niedersachsen and northern Germany, focusing on routes through Harz, Heide, and Wendland. The company is positioned as a trusted regional transportation operator with a clear business model centered on passenger rail services. The website provides comprehensive travel information, live schedules, ticketing options, and customer support, targeting regional train passengers. The parent company is Netinera, a known transportation group, which adds to erixx's market credibility. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and integrates a Progressive Web App manifest for enhanced user experience. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, ensuring reliable performance and security. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with embedded third-party widgets for timetable and route planning. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and follows several best practices, though explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are not clearly visible in the HTML. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR, featuring clear privacy and cookie policies. The risk profile is low with no signs of malicious activity or content safety concerns. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing a security.txt file, and providing explicit incident response contacts to improve security posture and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching erixx.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

erixx GmbH operates in the regional transportation sector, serving passengers in Niedersachsen and northern Germany. Its competitive advantage lies in localized service coverage and integration with regional transport associations like GVH and VRB. The business model focuses on passenger rail transport with revenue from ticket sales and partnerships. The company targets commuters, tourists, and regional travelers. Growth indicators include digital service enhancements like the FahrPlaner app and active social media engagement. The partnership ecosystem includes regional transport authorities and the parent company Netinera, which supports operational scale and expertise. The website reflects a mature digital presence aligned with industry standards.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and use of Cloudflare DNS services. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were found. However, the lack of explicit security headers and absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file indicate room for improvement. GDPR compliance is evident through comprehensive privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness is not clearly communicated, which could impact response effectiveness. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate clickjacking and MIME sniffing risks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  3. Provide explicit incident response contact information on the website to enhance trust and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and widgets to prevent supply chain vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance user awareness by providing security best practices and data protection information in customer-facing sections.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
erixx GmbH
Description
erixx operates regional train services through Harz, Heide, Wendland in Niedersachsen and northern Germany, providing passenger rail transport.
Key services
regional train transport, timetable and live schedule information, ticketing and fare information, customer support and contact, career opportunities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Cloudflare DNS, Hafas timetable widget, Progressive Web App (PWA) manifest
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of service worker for PWA

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive for regional train passengers.
  3. No signs of phishing or malware.
  4. Social media presence is active and consistent with brand.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and PWA features.
  8. Clear contact information and customer support options.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, including integration of the Hafas timetable widget for live schedule data. It supports Progressive Web App features with a manifest and service worker, improving mobile user experience. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external scripts which may impact load times. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Technical risks are low but monitoring third-party dependencies is recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with erixx.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review erixx.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.