Skip to main content

Security report for erickuster.com

Eric Kuster · Real Estate · Netherlands

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

33/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eric Kuster is a Netherlands-based interior design and furniture business with a strong online presence showcasing luxury projects, furniture collections, and retail showrooms. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, integrating modern plugins and cookie consent management. The business targets clients interested in high-end interior design and furniture products, offering appointment scheduling and e-commerce capabilities via a subdomain shop.erickuster.com. Technically, the site uses a modern tech stack with good SEO and mobile optimization, though performance is moderate. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is partial due to absence of explicit privacy and terms policies. Overall, the domain registration aligns well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching erickuster.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
33

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the luxury interior design and furniture retail sector, targeting affluent customers and design enthusiasts. The business model combines service offerings (design projects, appointments) with product sales (furniture, books). The partnership with Internetbureau Jun-E-Jay for website development indicates a professional digital strategy. The presence of a dedicated e-commerce subdomain suggests diversified revenue streams. The company maintains a consistent brand image and leverages social media channels for marketing. Growth potential is supported by a well-structured website and clear contact channels.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent management, reflecting awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a published security policy or incident response contacts indicate room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site would benefit from implementing a vulnerability disclosure policy and enhancing security headers to mitigate risks. Incident response readiness is not evident from the content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to minimize vulnerability risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clearer social media link URLs for improved user experience and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Eric Kuster
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eric Kuster
Description
Eric Kuster is a business focused on interior design projects, furniture, and retail stores/showrooms. The website showcases projects, furniture collections, books, and offers appointment scheduling and contact options. The business appears to be based in the Netherlands.
Key services
Interior design projects, Furniture sales, Showrooms and store locations, Book sales, Appointment scheduling
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Carousel, Magnific Popup, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Rank Math SEO, Elementor, Elementskit, Contact Form 7, 3D Flipbook
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent via Cookiebot
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with consent management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good content structure
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or linked pages
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and page builder (Elementor)
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  8. Social media links present but URLs are missing href attributes in HTML snippet
  9. Multiple external domains related to marketing and cookie consent
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with Elementor 3.28.3 and uses several plugins including Contact Form 7, Cookiebot, Rank Math SEO, and 3D Flipbook. The tech stack includes jQuery, Slick Carousel, and Magnific Popup for UI components. Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot scripts are used for analytics and consent management. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design breakpoints and lazy loading for images. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and script optimization. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and business information. Overall, the technical implementation is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with erickuster.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review erickuster.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.