Skip to main content

Security report for erecording.com

CSC · Real Estate · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CSC operates as a leading enterprise-focused provider of electronic document recording (eRecording) solutions, serving real estate document submitters and county recorders across the United States. The company emphasizes reliability, compliance, and efficiency, leveraging industry certifications such as ISO 27001 and SOC audits to assure security and trust. Their market position is strong, being first to market with eRecording in the U.S. and maintaining partnerships with key industry associations and software vendors. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive service descriptions and a professional user experience. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Optimizely, hosted likely on Microsoft Azure. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with secure form handling and reCAPTCHA integration. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforced and adherence to recognized security frameworks, though some security headers could be explicitly confirmed. Overall, CSC demonstrates a strong security and compliance posture with clear privacy policies and certifications. The lack of public WHOIS data is likely due to privacy protection and does not detract from the site's legitimacy. The site is safe for general audiences and free from adult or questionable content. Strategic recommendations include publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and enhancing security header implementation to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching erecording.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CSC's business intelligence reveals a well-established B2B service provider specializing in real estate and financial document recording solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in early market entry, comprehensive jurisdiction coverage, and integration with major industry software platforms. Revenue streams likely include subscription and transaction fees from submitters and county recorders. The target customer segments are enterprises requiring secure, efficient document recording services. Growth indicators include ongoing partnerships and certifications. The partnership ecosystem includes digital brand and cyber risk services via cscdbs.com, enhancing their service portfolio and market reach.

Security posture

CSC exhibits a mature security posture with ISO 27001 certification and SOC audits, indicating strong internal controls and risk management. The website uses HTTPS exclusively and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options were not confirmed and should be verified. Incident response contact information and vulnerability disclosure policies are not publicly available, representing potential areas for improvement. Overall, CSC maintains a secure environment aligned with industry best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a publicly accessible vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  2. Explicitly implement and verify security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against clickjacking and MIME sniffing.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Enhance user awareness of privacy and security practices through visible trust seals and certifications.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CSC
Description
Trusted by enterprises for years, CSC eRecording.com provides reliable, nationwide document recording and submission services.
Key services
eRecording solutions for submitters, Solutions for county recorders, Electronic document preparation, signing, notarization, and submission, Nationwide jurisdiction coverage, Integration with industry software vendors
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap 5, Google Tag Manager, Optimizely, Bot Framework Web Chat, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on forms
  • ISO 27001 and SOC certifications
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form handling with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Pingdom Real User Monitoring
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Optimizely, Pingdom RUM
Marketing tools
Optimizely
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong focus on B2B real estate eRecording services
  3. Multiple industry certifications and association memberships cited
  4. Comprehensive navigation with detailed service offerings
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. No security or privacy policy gaps detected
  7. WHOIS data unavailable publicly, possibly due to privacy protection
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and robust technical infrastructure, leveraging Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for dynamic interactions. Hosting appears to be on Microsoft Azure, providing scalability and reliability. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Optimizely supports advanced analytics and A/B testing capabilities. The site loads with moderate performance, optimized for mobile devices and accessibility standards. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were identified. Opportunities exist to further optimize performance and security headers to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with erecording.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review erecording.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.