Skip to main content

Security report for eprotocole.fr

eProtocole · Transportation · France

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

eProtocole is a French-based company specializing in the digitalization and collaborative management of security protocols primarily for the transportation and logistics sectors. Their SaaS platform facilitates communication and compliance between various stakeholders such as order givers, commissionaires, transporters, and drivers. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and modern web technologies, featuring SEO optimization and mobile responsiveness. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and use of reCAPTCHA, although explicit security headers and policies are not fully implemented or published. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, but the website's content and social media presence support its credibility. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent mechanisms present but no clear privacy or terms of service pages. Overall, the site presents a solid business offering with room for improvement in transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eprotocole.fr

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets a niche market within transportation and logistics, offering a specialized software solution to streamline security protocol management. Their business model is SaaS-based, focusing on collaboration and compliance facilitation. The website indicates a small-sized enterprise founded around 2019, with a consistent brand identity and active social media engagement. Partnerships include related transport and logistics platforms, enhancing their ecosystem. Revenue streams likely derive from subscription fees for platform access. Growth indicators include recent product updates and demo offerings. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding compliance documentation and enhancing direct contact options to improve trust and customer acquisition.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, limiting transparency in security management. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern for domain trustworthiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is partial, with cookie consent present but no detailed privacy policy. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by publishing security policies, implementing additional headers, and providing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to improve security transparency.
  4. Add clear company contact emails and phone numbers to facilitate communication and support.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
eProtocole
Description
eProtocole dématérialise vos protocoles de sécurité. Une solution informatique collaborative qui facilite la gestion des protocoles de sécurité entre les donneurs d’ordres, les commissionnaires, les transporteurs et leurs conducteurs.
Key services
Digital management of security protocols, Collaborative platform for stakeholders in transport and logistics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Colibri Page Builder, Google Fonts, Matomo Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, Matomo
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, LinkedIn Insight, Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is business-focused on digital security protocol management for transport and logistics.
  3. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found, but cookie consent is implemented.
  4. Contact available only via contact form; no explicit emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
  7. No security policy, incident response, or vulnerability disclosure information published.
  8. No certifications or compliance badges displayed.
  9. Social media presence includes Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, and Instagram.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Colibri Page Builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and maintainable infrastructure. It leverages jQuery and Google Fonts for UI enhancements and uses Matomo and LinkedIn Insight for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical stack is appropriate for a small to medium business with a focus on content management and marketing analytics.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eprotocole.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eprotocole.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.