Skip to main content

Security report for eplocomotivefc.com

El Paso Locomotive FC · Transportation · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

El Paso Locomotive FC operates as a professional soccer team competing in the USL Championship, providing fans and stakeholders with official news, ticketing, roster, and schedule information through their website. The site serves as a central hub for fan engagement and team updates, positioning itself as a key digital asset in the sports entertainment sector. The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform, enhanced with modern SEO and analytics tools, including Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. The presence of cookie consent mechanisms and a comprehensive privacy policy indicates attention to privacy compliance and user data protection. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure; however, explicit security headers and incident response information are absent, suggesting room for improvement. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency, but the website content and branding are professional and consistent. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid digital presence with moderate risk factors primarily related to domain registration opacity and limited contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eplocomotivefc.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a medium-sized sports organization focused on soccer within the USL Championship league. Its business model revolves around fan engagement, ticket sales, and brand promotion. The site integrates with league partners such as USL and Gainbridge Super League, indicating a strong partnership ecosystem. The use of multiple social media channels and marketing tools suggests active audience outreach and digital marketing strategies. The absence of direct contact details and security policies may limit trust for some users, but the overall professional presentation supports a credible market position. Growth indicators include active content updates and integration with league-wide digital platforms.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting baseline security and privacy compliance. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, and no incident response contacts are provided, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The extensive use of third-party scripts and tracking pixels increases the attack surface and privacy risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and improving transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Audit and minimize third-party scripts to reduce privacy risks and potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Add clear and verified contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security inquiries.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
El Paso Locomotive FC
Description
El Paso Locomotive FC Homepage: The official source of Locomotive news, tickets, roster, gameday information, and schedule!
Key services
News updates, Ticket sales, Roster information, Gameday information, Schedule details
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.6.2, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, FontAwesome, SportsEngine platform, Osano cookie consent
Frameworks
React (vendor scripts), Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress, SportsEngine
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Quantcast, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
DoubleClick, Sitescout
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Meta Pixel, Quantcast
Marketing tools
ShareThis, WisePops
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional sports team official site
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins
  3. Implements cookie consent and privacy policy
  4. Extensive use of third-party analytics and advertising scripts
  5. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage
  6. WHOIS data unavailable or domain not registered
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure
  8. No terms of service page detected
  9. Good SEO and structured data implementation
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.6.2 with Yoast SEO plugin, leveraging React vendor scripts and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. It uses FontAwesome for icons and integrates SportsEngine platform components. The site loads multiple external resources including fonts, analytics, and advertising scripts, which may impact performance. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO is well implemented with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing third-party script loading and caching strategies. The technical stack is modern but requires ongoing maintenance to ensure security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eplocomotivefc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eplocomotivefc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.