Skip to main content

Security report for epfif.fr

EPFIF · Real Estate · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EPF Ile-de-France (EPFIF) is a public land operator dedicated to supporting the development of housing and economic projects in the Ile-de-France region. It plays a key role in mobilizing land, combating substandard housing, and requalifying degraded properties. The organization is positioned as a major public entity with a medium-sized operational scale, serving local authorities and the public sector. The website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence, leveraging WordPress CMS with modern plugins and SEO tools to provide rich content and user-friendly navigation. Social media integration and official publications enhance its credibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy given the official nature of the content and presence. Overall, the site is well-structured, compliant with privacy regulations, and serves its public sector mission effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching epfif.fr

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention epfif.fr, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4
Employees
0
Customers
3
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
0%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for epfif.fr.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EPFIF operates in the real estate and government sectors, focusing on land mobilization and housing development in the Ile-de-France region. Its business model is centered on public service and urban development, with strategic partnerships and a clear governance structure. The organization publishes annual reports, strategic roadmaps, and regulatory documents, indicating transparency and accountability. The target audience includes local governments, developers, and citizens interested in housing and urban planning. The website's content and social media presence suggest active engagement and a stable market position. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent public entity. The digital infrastructure supports moderate performance and good mobile optimization, suitable for its audience.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms, demonstrating compliance with basic security and privacy standards. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, which could be enhanced to improve protection against common web attacks. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. The use of nonce tokens in AJAX calls indicates attention to secure form handling. The lack of a security.txt file or published incident response policies suggests room for improvement in vulnerability disclosure and incident management. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional hardening and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  3. Develop and make publicly available incident response and security policies to demonstrate preparedness and build trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate risks from vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance WHOIS data transparency or domain registration information to improve domain trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EPFIF
Description
EPF Ile-de-France-EPFIF est l'opérateur public foncier des collectivités franciliennes. Il contribue à développer l'offre de logements et au soutien du développement économique.
Key services
Mobilisation foncière, Lutte contre l’habitat indigne, Développement économique, Requalification des copropriétés dégradées, Support au logement
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO, Slick Slider, Font Awesome 4.7.0, Custom Twitter Feeds Pro, Cookie Notice plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce in AJAX calls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Custom Twitter Feeds Pro
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Strong presence of official and regulatory information
  3. Multiple social media verified accounts linked
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy implemented
  5. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content
  8. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1, utilizing a modern tech stack including jQuery, Slick Slider, Font Awesome, and Google Analytics/Tag Manager for tracking. SEO is optimized with Yoast SEO plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) is implemented for enhanced search engine understanding. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility features and clear navigation. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts and media content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. The technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could be optimized further for speed and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with epfif.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review epfif.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.