Skip to main content

Security report for eparking.lv

eParking · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

eParking is a Latvian-based service platform specializing in providing users with an interactive map and information about parking locations primarily within Latvia. The website offers a user-friendly interface with a detailed map powered by Google Maps API, allowing users to locate parking lots and access related details. The business targets drivers and vehicle owners seeking convenient parking solutions. The platform supports user login and registration, indicating a service model that may include personalized features or account management. Technically, the website employs legacy jQuery alongside modern JavaScript modules and Google Maps services, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. While the site includes GDPR-compliant cookie consent and a privacy policy, it lacks visible terms of service, security policies, or incident response contacts, which are important for comprehensive compliance and trust. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS assumed but lacking explicit security headers and using outdated libraries. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from technical and security enhancements to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eparking.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
80
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, focusing on parking management services within Latvia. Its business model revolves around providing location-based services through an interactive map, likely monetizing through partnerships or service fees. The platform's extensive listing of parking locations suggests a strong local presence and a comprehensive database. The absence of visible contact information or social media presence may limit direct customer engagement but maintains a focused service approach. The use of Google Maps API indicates reliance on third-party services for core functionality. Growth potential exists through expanding service features, improving mobile optimization, and enhancing user engagement. The company appears to be a medium-sized local player with consistent branding and a clear market niche.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. It uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications, and implements a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism with appropriate cookie attributes. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version (1.7.1) introduces potential vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The absence of visible contact channels for security issues and lack of security policy documentation are gaps in compliance and trust. Overall, while basic security measures are in place, improvements are needed to align with modern security standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear terms of service, security policies, and incident response contact information to improve transparency and compliance.
  4. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features to improve user experience across devices and for users with disabilities.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
eParking
Description
eParking provides parking lot location and management services primarily in Latvia, offering users an interactive map to find parking locations.
Key services
Interactive parking lot map, Parking lot details and navigation, User account login and registration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Maps API, jQuery 1.7.1, JavaScript ES modules
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (assumed from URL)
  • Cookie consent mechanism with SameSite=Strict

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides an interactive map with numerous parking locations in Latvia.
  2. Cookie consent banner is implemented in Latvian language.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage or in the provided HTML.
  4. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  5. Uses Google Maps API extensively for location services.
  6. Website uses an outdated jQuery version (1.7.1) which may pose security risks.
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in the provided content.
  8. No social media links or external social profiles found.
  9. No forms detected except login and registration links (not detailed in HTML).
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages Google Maps API extensively for its core functionality, integrating advanced map features and custom markers for parking locations. The technology stack includes legacy jQuery 1.7.1 and modern JavaScript ES modules, indicating partial modernization. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and uses external CSS stylesheets. Performance appears moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Accessibility and SEO are basic, with some meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the provided data. The site uses a cookie consent banner with JavaScript to manage user consent, reflecting compliance with GDPR requirements. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but would benefit from modernization and optimization efforts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eparking.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eparking.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.