Skip to main content

Security report for eoltas.lv

UAB “Eoltas” · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EOLTAS is a well-established automotive parts retailer and distributor operating primarily in Latvia and the Baltic region since 1993. The company offers a wide range of engine and chassis parts for light and commercial vehicles sourced from Europe, Japan, and the USA. Their market position is strong, supported by authorized representation of over 80 manufacturers and adherence to ISO 9001 and TS16949 quality standards. The website serves both retail and B2B customers, providing an e-commerce platform with extensive product listings and customer information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eoltas.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention eoltas.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
192
Employees
3
Customers
181
Third parties
8
Weak passwords
34%

Latest record dated 2026-05-20 · 9 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for eoltas.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –b8b.eoltas.lv2026-05-20
  • –b7b.eoltas.lv2025-07-19
  • –b2b.eoltas.lv2025-06-16

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets responsible vehicle owners and commercial operators, leveraging a business model focused on online sales and B2B services. Their competitive advantage lies in a broad product portfolio, quality certifications, and regional presence. The website integrates multiple marketing and tracking tools, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Partnerships and authorized dealership status with numerous manufacturers enhance their market credibility. Growth indicators include a large inventory and multi-country service coverage.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and includes privacy and cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting compliance with GDPR. However, it lacks explicit security headers and incident response policies, which are recommended for enhanced security posture. The use of third-party tracking scripts is balanced with user consent, but continuous monitoring for vulnerabilities in these scripts is advised. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the site against common web attacks.
  2. Publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from external libraries.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB “Eoltas”
Description
EOLTAS is a growing auto parts trading company operating since 1993, serving responsible drivers in Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, and Europe. They offer engine and chassis parts for light and commercial vehicles from Europe, Japan, and the USA, representing over 80 manufacturers and holding ISO 9001 and TS16949 quality certifications.
Key services
Online sales of automotive spare parts, B2B client services, Delivery and order fulfillment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Omnisend, Custom JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Privacy policy present
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Omnisend
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Omnisend
Marketing tools
Omnisend
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. Multiple contact methods including email and phone are clearly provided.
  5. Website uses modern tracking and marketing technologies with consent mechanisms.
  6. Business information is detailed and consistent with a medium-sized retail company in automotive parts.
  7. No security.txt or explicit incident response policies found.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Website is well structured with good SEO and mobile optimization.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Omnisend for marketing and analytics. The presence of Vue.js-like attributes suggests a SPA or component-based frontend framework. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site lacks explicit CMS identification but appears custom-built or heavily customized. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional e-commerce experience with room for security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eoltas.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eoltas.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.