Skip to main content

Security report for envo.lv

SIA PLASTIX · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ENVO is a Latvian-based e-commerce business specializing in the sale of packaging materials such as envelopes, tapes, boxes, and protective fillers. The company operates an online store targeting both business and retail customers primarily within Latvia. Established in 2008 under the legal entity SIA PLASTIX, ENVO positions itself as a reliable local supplier offering competitive pricing and a broad product range. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and is mobile-optimized, supporting a positive user experience. The presence of social media links and contact information further supports customer engagement and trust. Technically, the website leverages common web technologies including OpenCart CMS, jQuery, Bootstrap, and various marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar. The site is served over HTTPS with no visible blocking or WAF interference, indicating a secure and accessible infrastructure. However, security headers are not explicitly detected, and there is no visible security policy or incident response information published, which could be improved. From a security and privacy perspective, the site implements a cookie consent banner and provides a privacy policy in Latvian, indicating basic GDPR compliance. Contact details and physical address are clearly presented, enhancing business credibility. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits domain registration verification, but the website content and business information appear consistent and legitimate. Overall, the site demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with room for enhancement in security best practices and transparency. The overall risk assessment is low, with no signs of malicious activity or suspicious content. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, and enhancing incident response visibility to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching envo.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ENVO operates in the retail and e-commerce sector focused on packaging materials in Latvia. The company benefits from a clear market niche with a comprehensive product catalog and an established online presence since 2008. Its competitive advantage lies in offering a wide range of packaging solutions including custom printed tapes and eco-friendly fillers. The business model is direct-to-customer e-commerce with additional support through physical warehouse access. The target customers include small to medium enterprises and individual consumers requiring packaging supplies. The company maintains active social media engagement and uses multiple digital marketing tools to drive traffic and conversions. Growth indicators include regular product updates and promotional offers. The partnership ecosystem includes advertising networks like Google Ads and tracking services such as Hotjar and Facebook Pixel. Overall, ENVO shows a stable operational model with potential for expansion through enhanced digital marketing and security improvements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and other web-based attacks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness for security incidents. GDPR compliance is indicated but could be strengthened with clearer data retention and processing disclosures. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small e-commerce site but would benefit from implementing recommended security best practices and improving incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to avoid known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy policy details with explicit data retention and processing information to strengthen GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA PLASTIX
Registration number
40103488444
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA PLASTIX
Description
ENVO is an online store offering various types of envelopes and packaging materials at low prices, targeting businesses and customers in Latvia.
Key services
Sale of envelopes, Packaging materials, Custom printed tapes, Delivery services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Nivo Slider, Owl Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, CookieConsent
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Albacross
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Remarketing, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian e-commerce store specializing in packaging materials.
  2. Content is in Latvian language with clear business focus.
  3. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  4. Site uses multiple tracking and marketing tools including Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar.
  5. Cookie consent banner is implemented in Latvian language.
  6. Contact information including phone, email, and physical address is clearly provided.
  7. No explicit security.txt or incident response information found.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Site uses OpenCart CMS with common JS libraries and plugins.
  10. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the OpenCart CMS platform, utilizing popular front-end libraries such as jQuery and Bootstrap for responsive design and UI components. It integrates multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Albacross for tracking and retargeting. The site loads a variety of CSS and JS assets for carousels, sliders, and autocomplete features, indicating a moderately complex front-end. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of key scripts. Mobile optimization is good with responsive layouts and touch-friendly elements. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA attributes and better keyboard navigation support. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small to medium e-commerce site but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with envo.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review envo.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.