Skip to main content

Security report for entur.no

Entur AS · Transportation · Norway

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Entur AS operates as Norway's national travel planner, consolidating multiple modes of public transportation including bus, train, boat, tram, metro, and flights into a single platform. The company provides comprehensive travel search, ticketing, and real-time departure information, positioning itself as the leading travel planning service in Norway. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and offers a seamless user experience for a broad audience of travelers within Norway. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks such as React, Firebase backend services, and integrates mapping services via Mapbox. Privacy and cookie compliance are well implemented with Usercentrics consent management, and analytics are handled through PostHog and Firebase Analytics. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms could be improved. Overall, Entur demonstrates a mature digital presence aligned with its business goals and regulatory requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching entur.no

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
95
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Entur AS holds a strong market position as the essential national travel planner in Norway, serving both everyday commuters and tourists. Its business model focuses on providing integrated travel information and ticketing services, likely funded or supported by public transportation authorities. The company targets a wide demographic including general public users seeking efficient travel solutions. Partnerships with transport providers and integration with European train services indicate a broad ecosystem. The company’s digital maturity is evidenced by its use of modern cloud infrastructure and analytics, supporting scalability and data-driven improvements. Growth potential lies in expanding ticketing services and enhancing user personalization through account features. The presence of official social media channels and transparent corporate information supports credibility and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with HTTPS encryption and cookie consent management. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers and a dedicated security policy page limits transparency. Incident response is partially addressed via an incident portal link, but no direct security contact emails were found. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy policies and consent mechanisms. The security posture is appropriate for the business type but could be enhanced by publishing a security.txt file and more detailed security documentation. Overall, the site maintains a low risk profile with room for improvement in formal security communication and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and incident response procedures.
  2. Add standard security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Provide explicit security contact information (e.g., security@entur.org) to streamline incident reporting.
  5. Continue monitoring and updating third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Entur AS
Registration number
917 422 575
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Entur AS
Description
Entur is a national travel planner that consolidates all public transport options in Norway including bus, train, boat, tram, metro, and flights, enabling users to easily find travel routes from door to door across the country.
Key services
Travel search and planning, Map and departure times, Ticket sales, Travel information and assistance
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Firebase, Mapbox GL JS, Usercentrics CMP, Telia ACE Web SDK
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Firebase
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Usercentrics for cookie consent
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with autocomplete off

Analytics and tracking

Services
PostHog, Firebase Analytics (implied by Firebase config)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
PostHog
Marketing tools
Usercentrics CMP
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to Norwegian public transport users.
  3. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  5. Social media presence on major platforms enhances trust.
  6. No security.txt or explicit security policy page found.
  7. No phone numbers explicitly labeled as company contact found in HTML content.
  8. Email contact found in footer for web editor but no explicit security or DPO contact emails.
  9. Incident reporting portal link provided in footer.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React for frontend, Firebase for backend and hosting, and Mapbox for mapping services. It uses Usercentrics for GDPR-compliant cookie management and PostHog for analytics. The site loads efficiently with deferred JavaScript and optimized images, indicating good performance. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are well implemented, supporting a broad user base. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Hosting on Firebase implies scalable and reliable infrastructure. Technical risks are minimal but could include dependency on third-party services and the need for continuous security updates. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively with modern best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with entur.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review entur.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.