Skip to main content

Security report for enterpriseplus.com

Enterprise Rent-A-Car · Transportation · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Enterprise Rent-A-Car operates a comprehensive vehicle rental service with a strong loyalty program aimed at frequent renters and business travelers. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and mobile optimization. The use of modern technologies such as React and Adobe Experience Manager indicates a robust technical infrastructure supporting the business operations. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and standard security headers, though explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are not publicly visible. Overall, the site demonstrates high trustworthiness and business credibility consistent with a large enterprise in the transportation sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching enterpriseplus.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Enterprise holds a leading market position in the vehicle rental industry, supported by its loyalty program to retain customers. The business model focuses on rental services with value-added loyalty benefits. The company targets both leisure and business travelers, leveraging subsidiaries like National Car Rental and Alamo to cover diverse market segments. The website's integration with Adobe marketing and analytics tools suggests a data-driven approach to customer engagement and marketing. The presence of comprehensive privacy and cookie policies aligns with regulatory compliance and customer trust strategies.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and security headers, indicating adherence to best practices. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, the absence of a public security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. The site uses secure forms and input validation, reducing risk of common web vulnerabilities. Recommendations include publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contacts to enhance security maturity and customer confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a public vulnerability disclosure and incident response policy to improve transparency.
  2. Add explicit security policy information and contact channels for security incidents.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and tracking technologies for security risks.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie consent mechanisms to ensure ongoing regulatory compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Enterprise Rent-A-Car
Description
Enterprise Rent-A-Car offers vehicle rental services with a loyalty program for frequent customers. The site provides information about membership benefits and how to enroll.
Key services
Car rental, Loyalty program enrollment, Customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Adobe DTM, Typekit Fonts, YouTube iframe embed
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with input validation
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe DTM, Adobe Audience Manager (demdex)
Marketing tools
Adobe Experience Manager, Typekit Fonts
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack including React and Adobe Experience Manager, supporting dynamic content and marketing integrations. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization. The use of Adobe DTM and Audience Manager indicates advanced marketing and tracking capabilities. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve accessibility and publish more detailed security and compliance documentation. Hosting details are not explicit but likely enterprise-grade given the brand scale.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enterpriseplus.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enterpriseplus.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.