Skip to main content

Security report for enterprisemobility.fr

Enterprise Mobility · Transportation · France

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Enterprise Mobility is a well-established global mobility services provider with over 65 years of history, operating under the parent company Enterprise Holdings, Inc. The company offers a broad portfolio of services including car rental, fleet management, truck rental, vehicle subscription, luxury rentals, car sharing, and technology solutions. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in multimedia content, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Next.js, integrates performance monitoring tools, and employs industry-standard analytics and tag management solutions. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, although some security headers could be improved. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, demonstrating good privacy practices. The absence of WHOIS data due to privacy protection is typical for large enterprises and does not detract from the site's legitimacy. Overall, the website reflects a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and operational maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching enterprisemobility.fr

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
80
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Enterprise Mobility holds a strong market position in the transportation sector, targeting business and leisure travelers as well as corporate and government clients. Their business model focuses on providing diverse mobility solutions with an emphasis on customer experience and innovation. The company leverages a global network and maintains consistent branding and messaging across languages and regions. Partnerships with privacy and legal service providers enhance compliance and trust. The company’s digital ecosystem includes multiple domains for different markets and languages, indicating a sophisticated operational structure. Growth indicators include investment in technology solutions and sustainability initiatives. The company’s social media presence and media resources support brand engagement and transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and content delivery networks enhances security and performance. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a minor gap. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Privacy policies are comprehensive and indicate GDPR compliance, but no direct security contact channels were found. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from publishing more explicit security governance information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency.
  2. Add and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Provide direct security contact information or abuse reporting channels on the website.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Enterprise Mobility
Description
Enterprise Mobility is a leading provider of mobility services with over 65 years of history, aiming to be the world’s best and most trusted mobility company. They offer a wide range of services including car rental, fleet management, truck rental, vehicle subscription, luxury rentals, car sharing, vanpooling, vehicle sales, and technology solutions.
Key services
Car rental, Fleet management, Truck rental, Vehicle sales, Car sharing, Vanpooling, Luxury car rental, Vehicle subscription, Technology solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), Google Tag Manager, Adobe Launch (Adobe DTM), Boomerang (performance monitoring), Akamai (CDN)
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Adobe Boomerang
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe Launch
Marketing tools
Adobe Launch
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. No WAF or blocking detected.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection.
  4. Strong branding and consistent messaging.
  5. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main site; contact via external contact page.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and performance monitoring tools.
  8. Social media presence on major platforms.
  9. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with server-side rendering and static generation, ensuring fast load times and good SEO. It uses Google Tag Manager and Adobe Launch for analytics and tag management, and Akamai as a CDN for content delivery. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as ARIA labels and keyboard navigation support. Performance monitoring is implemented via Boomerang. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a high-quality user experience. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and publish more detailed security governance information.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enterprisemobility.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enterprisemobility.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.