Skip to main content

Security report for entenrennen-nuertingen.de

Entenrennen Nürtingen · Non-profit · Germany

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Entenrennen Nürtingen is a small-scale, community-focused non-profit organization that organizes an annual charity duck race event in Nürtingen, Germany. The event supports various local social and youth projects, leveraging partnerships with Lions Clubs and Round Table organizations. The website serves as an informational platform for the event, sponsors, and ticket sales locations. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and WPBakery Page Builder, hosted by a German provider (webgo.de). The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificates, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is generally good, though improvements can be made by adding security headers and incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but lacking a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, supporting a reputable local charity event.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching entenrennen-nuertingen.de

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
33
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention entenrennen-nuertingen.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for entenrennen-nuertingen.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector, focusing on community engagement and fundraising through an annual event. Its market position is local and well-established, with a history of at least 22 years. The business model revolves around selling numbered duck tickets to raise funds for social projects. Partnerships with Lions Clubs and Round Table enhance credibility and outreach. The website lists multiple sponsors, indicating a healthy partnership ecosystem. The target audience includes local residents and supporters of charitable causes. Growth indicators include consistent event scheduling and sponsor engagement. The organization maintains a clear and consistent brand identity aligned with its charitable mission.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, it lacks advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism may pose GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small non-profit informational site but could benefit from enhancements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and inform users about cookie usage.
  4. Publish explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for general inquiries and security incidents to improve transparency and user trust.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Entenrennen Nürtingen
Description
Beim 22. Nürtinger Entenrennen schwimmen nummerierte, gelbe Quietsche-Enten gemeinsam auf dem Neckar für die gute Sache um die Wette.
Key services
Organizing annual charity duck race event, Selling numbered duck tickets, Supporting local social and youth projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, jQuery, Bootstrap
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of updated WordPress and plugins

Analytics and tracking

Services
WP Statistics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based charity event site for the annual Nürtinger Entenrennen.
  2. Content is in German and well-structured with clear event and contact information.
  3. No forms detected on the main page; no direct contact emails or phone numbers visible.
  4. Social media presence includes Facebook links related to Lions Clubs.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts found.
  6. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy mechanism detected.
  7. Site uses HTTPS with valid SSL and modern plugins.
  8. Sponsors and partners are prominently displayed with external links.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization and WPBakery Page Builder for layout management. It employs Slider Revolution for dynamic content presentation and Bootstrap for responsive design. Hosting is provided by webgo.de, a German hosting provider, as indicated by the nameservers. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile-optimized with a clear navigation structure. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is enhanced by meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated technologies. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms to modern standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with entenrennen-nuertingen.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review entenrennen-nuertingen.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.