Skip to main content

Security report for enna.lv

Enna · Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Enna is a Latvian-based building management company specializing in full-cycle engineering system management and energy efficiency solutions. As part of the UPB industrial group, it leverages over 30 years of experience and manages approximately 400 properties. The company targets property owners and industrial/commercial building managers, offering services such as complex object management, engineering system audits, project management, and building automation systems. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and provides clear contact information and client references, indicating a solid market position. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern optimizations including Autoptimize, Google Tag Manager, and Cloudflare Turnstile captcha for security. It demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and SEO practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers and policies could be improved. No vulnerabilities or suspicious elements were detected. Overall, the website reflects a mature digital presence with good privacy compliance and business credibility. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain registration insights, but the association with UPB and professional presentation support legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and implementing vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching enna.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
28
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Enna operates in the real estate and energy sectors, providing specialized building management and engineering services. Its business model focuses on long-term service contracts with commercial and industrial clients, leveraging its parent company UPB's industrial expertise. The company’s competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive service offering, 30+ years of experience, and integration within a larger industrial group. The website showcases a broad partnership ecosystem and a diverse client base, indicating stable revenue streams and growth potential. The multilingual site supports regional and international outreach. The company’s operations appear well-structured with clear service segmentation and professional branding, positioning it as a reliable mid-sized player in the Latvian market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Cloudflare Turnstile captcha to protect forms from automated abuse. Cookie consent and privacy policy indicate GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No incident response or security contact information is published, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting and mitigation. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is solid for a corporate website but could benefit from enhanced headers and published security policies to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to ensure no vulnerable components are in use.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security training to foster a security-aware culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA ENNA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Enna
Description
ENNA is a building management company providing full-cycle engineering system management, technical maintenance, and energy efficiency solutions for various buildings and industrial objects. It is part of the UPB industrial group.
Key services
Complex object management, Engineering systems management, Audits and consultations, Project and process management, Building automation systems (BMS), Energy efficiency solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cloudflare Turnstile Captcha, Autoptimize, AOS (Animate On Scroll), jQuery (implied by slick slider usage)
Frameworks
WPML (multilingual plugin)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • Cloudflare Turnstile captcha for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (implied by _fbp cookie)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is business-focused on building management and engineering services.
  3. Multilingual support with Latvian, English, and Russian versions.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; domain registration details unknown.
  7. Strong branding and consistent design.
  8. Multiple client logos and partner links indicate established business relationships.
  9. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with multilingual support via WPML. It uses modern front-end technologies including Autoptimize for asset optimization, AOS for animations, and slick slider for client logos. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for analytics and marketing. Cloudflare Turnstile captcha is used for form protection. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate with caching and asset optimization in place. No hosting provider details were found. Technical risks include potential outdated plugins or missing security headers, which should be addressed to maintain operational stability and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enna.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enna.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.