Skip to main content

Security report for eml.ee

Tschudi Shipping Company AS · Transportation · Norway

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tschudi Shipping Company AS is a well-established, family-owned Norwegian shipping and logistics group with a history dating back to 1883. The company offers a broad range of integrated services including shipping, ship management, transshipment, energy advisory, ocean industries support, offshore wind support, logistics, and financial services. With offices in 12 countries and a strong presence in the Nordics, Baltic, and Continental Europe, Tschudi Group positions itself as a reliable partner for maritime and logistics solutions worldwide. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern web technologies such as jQuery, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and SEO, providing an excellent user experience. Privacy and cookie policies are clearly presented with consent mechanisms, reflecting good privacy compliance practices. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and anonymizes IPs in analytics. However, it lacks explicit security headers and does not provide a dedicated security policy or incident response contact information. The WHOIS data for the domain is incomplete or missing, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency but does not directly contradict the legitimacy of the business given the strong branding and consistent subsidiary domains. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and technical maturity. The main risks relate to domain registration transparency and the absence of detailed security policies. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and verifying domain registration details to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eml.ee

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Tschudi Group operates in the transportation and energy sectors, leveraging a diversified business model focused on shipping, logistics, and maritime services. The company benefits from a long heritage and family ownership, which supports brand trust and market positioning. Its global reach with a Nordic stronghold and multiple subsidiaries enables it to serve a broad customer base including industrial, maritime, and energy clients. The presence of energy advisory and offshore wind support services indicates strategic alignment with sustainable and emerging energy markets. The company’s use of digital tools and a professional web presence suggests a commitment to modernization and customer engagement. Partnerships and subsidiaries are clearly linked, supporting an integrated service offering. Growth indicators include recent updates and new service launches, reflecting active business development.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with mandatory HTTPS enabled and SSL configured well. The use of IP anonymization in Google Analytics and cookie consent mechanisms indicates awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The missing WHOIS data reduces domain registration transparency, which is a minor trust concern. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a corporate website but could be improved with additional headers and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration details to ensure transparency and build trust with visitors and partners.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools for vulnerabilities and compliance with privacy regulations.
  5. Enhance ongoing privacy compliance by documenting data retention policies and providing clear user data rights information.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Tschudi Shipping Company AS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tschudi Shipping Company AS
Description
Privately owned Norwegian shipping and logistics group, dating back to 1883, providing integrated solutions worldwide for logistics, shipping, energy and marine related activities.
Key services
Shipping, Ship Management, Transshipment, Energy Advisory Services, Ocean Industries, Offshore Wind Support, Logistics, Arctic Presence, Aggregates, Financial Services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, js-cookie
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WAF or blocking detected
  3. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, reducing transparency
  4. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts found
  6. Multiple subsidiary domains linked and branded consistently
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
  9. Contact information clearly presented in footer
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern front-end technologies including jQuery and JavaScript libraries for cookies and analytics. It uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking and marketing insights, with IP anonymization enabled. The site is hosted on Webflow's CDN, ensuring fast loading times and good global performance. The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with accessibility features implemented at a good level. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS other than Webflow CMS is detected. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, with opportunities to improve security headers and incident response transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eml.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eml.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.