Skip to main content

Security report for emergency.it

EMERGENCY · Non-profit · Italy

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EMERGENCY is a well-established Italian non-profit organization dedicated to providing free, high-quality medical care to victims of war, landmines, and poverty. The organization promotes a culture of peace and human rights, targeting a general audience with humanitarian services. The website reflects a consistent and professional brand image with good content quality and clear messaging. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using modern libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Video.js, with SEO optimization via Yoast plugin. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is trustworthy and credible but could improve transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching emergency.it

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
65
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention emergency.it, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
264
Employees
3
Customers
221
Third parties
40
Weak passwords
11%

Latest record dated 2026-02-02 · 21 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for emergency.it.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –ne.emergency.it2026-02-02
  • –ne.emergency.it2025-12-12
  • –ne.emergency.it2025-04-15

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EMERGENCY operates in the non-profit humanitarian sector, focusing on medical aid for war victims and vulnerable populations. Its business model is donation and volunteer-driven, with a strong market position as a recognized NGO in Italy and internationally. The organization leverages digital channels including social media for outreach. The website supports its mission with informative content and donation facilitation. There is no evidence of commercial advertising or affiliate programs. The organization maintains a consistent brand and messaging strategy, reinforcing trust and credibility among donors and beneficiaries.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses standard security practices for a WordPress-based site. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site uses Google Tag Manager and Analytics, indicating moderate user tracking but no advanced privacy controls were observed. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Provide clear incident response and security contact information on the website.
  4. Conduct an accessibility audit and improve features to meet WCAG standards.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EMERGENCY
Description
EMERGENCY offre cure gratuite e di elevata qualità alle vittime delle guerre, delle mine antiuomo, della povertà. Promuove una cultura di pace e diritti.
Key services
Free medical care to victims of war, Treatment for landmine victims, Promotion of peace and human rights
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap modal, Video.js, Slick slider, Yoast SEO plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and analytics scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally maintained non-profit organization site.
  2. Content is in Italian with English alternate language available.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found in the provided content.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  7. Social media presence confirmed via Facebook and Twitter meta tags.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap modal, Video.js, and Slick slider for UI components. SEO is managed via Yoast plugin with structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. The site loads external scripts from Google APIs and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the organization's digital presence effectively but can benefit from security and performance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with emergency.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review emergency.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.