Skip to main content

Security report for emeistars.lv

Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Emeistars.lv is a Latvian online platform dedicated to connecting customers with repair and construction service providers. The website serves as a marketplace where users can post jobs and craftsmen can register to offer their services. The platform emphasizes efficiency in finding the right craftsmen and offers additional content such as advice, user testimonials, and a catalog of service providers. The business targets individuals and small businesses in Latvia seeking renovation and construction services. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies including JavaScript and integrates popular analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Yandex Metrika. However, the site lacks modern security headers and visible privacy or cookie policies, which impacts its compliance posture. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain trust assessment. Overall, the platform appears functional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy practices to improve user trust and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching emeistars.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform operates in a niche market focused on repair and construction services within Latvia. Its business model is an online marketplace facilitating direct connections between service providers and customers, likely generating revenue through job postings or premium listings. The presence of partner logos and media mentions suggests some local market recognition. However, the site lacks visible contact details and comprehensive legal policies, which could hinder trust and growth. The platform's content and service offerings are relevant and targeted, but the technical and security infrastructure shows room for improvement to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage implied by external script sources but lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS. The login form is present but does not show advanced protections like CSRF tokens. No privacy or cookie policies are found, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. The use of multiple tracking services increases the need for clear privacy disclosures. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers, privacy policies, and secure form handling to reduce risks and improve compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance security posture.
  3. Enhance form security by adding CSRF tokens and input validation to protect against common web attacks.
  4. Conduct a full security audit including SSL/TLS configuration review and vulnerability scanning to identify and remediate risks.
  5. Publish WHOIS information or ensure domain registration details are accessible to improve domain trust and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Emeistars.lv is an electronic meeting place for repair and construction service providers and clients, facilitating efficient matching of jobs and craftsmen. It offers a platform for posting private contests to find craftsmen quickly and effectively with a focus on high security and quality.
Key services
Job posting for repair and construction work, Craftsmen registration and catalog, Advice and tips on renovation and construction, User reviews and feedback on craftsmen
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (Google Tag Manager and Analytics scripts loaded via https)
  • Login form with password field

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian platform for connecting repair and construction service providers with customers.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust analysis.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  4. Login form present but no visible advanced security measures.
  5. Use of multiple analytics and tracking services detected.
  6. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  7. Website content is in Latvian language and targets local market.
  8. Moderate use of images and basic layout with some JavaScript for UI effects.
  9. No CMS or hosting provider information detected.
  10. No social media links found in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses traditional HTML with embedded JavaScript for UI interactions and integrates third-party analytics and tag management services. No modern CMS or frameworks are detected, suggesting a custom or legacy platform. Performance appears moderate with no explicit mobile optimization or accessibility features identified. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags found. The site would benefit from modernization including responsive design, accessibility improvements, and enhanced SEO practices. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with emeistars.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review emeistars.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.