Skip to main content

Security report for elimopava.cz

Elim Opava, o.p.s. · Non-profit · Czech Republic

High risk. 13 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Elim Opava, o.p.s. is a well-established non-profit organization based in the Czech Republic, focused on providing social and community services such as low-threshold youth services, family assistance, volunteer coordination, foster family support, and community work. The organization has a strong local presence with a history dating back to 1998 and a dedicated facility since 2002. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content targeted at children, youth, families, and local community members. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins and jQuery, offering good mobile responsiveness and moderate performance. While HTTPS is properly implemented, the site lacks some security headers and formal privacy and cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. No forms are present on the homepage, and contact is provided via email and phone, supplemented by social media presence on Facebook. From a security perspective, the site shows a good baseline with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, improvements are recommended in implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The domain WHOIS data is consistent with the organization's claims, showing a long-standing registration that supports legitimacy. Overall, Elim Opava's website is a trustworthy and professional platform for their non-profit activities, with room for enhancement in privacy compliance and security best practices to further strengthen user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

13 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elimopava.cz

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Elim Opava operates in the non-profit social services sector, serving a niche community in Opava, Czech Republic. Their competitive advantage lies in their long history, physical infrastructure, and diverse service offerings that include youth engagement, family support, and community development. Funding appears to come from a broad partnership ecosystem including government bodies, foundations, and corporate sponsors. The organization targets vulnerable groups such as children, youth, and foster families, positioning itself as a key local social support entity. Growth indicators include active event programming and community engagement. Strategic partnerships with reputable public and private entities enhance credibility and resource access. The website content and partner listings suggest a stable operational model focused on social impact rather than commercial revenue.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no obvious exposure of sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options indicates potential areas for improvement to mitigate common web threats. There is no visible privacy policy or cookie consent mechanism, which is a compliance gap under GDPR and related regulations. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure practices are not publicly documented, limiting transparency and preparedness. The lack of a security.txt file further reduces the ease of responsible vulnerability reporting. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, enhancing security controls and compliance documentation would improve the organization's security posture and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen web security.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, including a security.txt file.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and scripts to prevent vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security training to foster a security-aware culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Elim Opava, o.p.s.
Registration number
02278197
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Elim Opava, o.p.s.
Description
Non-profit organization focused on providing social and community services including low-threshold services for youth, family assistance, volunteer center, foster family support, and community work in Opava, Czech Republic.
Key services
Nízkoprahové služby (Low-threshold services), Pomoc rodinám s dětmi (Family assistance), Dobrovolnické centrum (Volunteer center), Doprovázení pěstounských rodin (Foster family support), Komunitní práce (Community work), Pronájem tělocvičny (Gym rental)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Gutena Lightbox plugin
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-established non-profit social service provider in the Czech Republic.
  2. Content is in Czech language and well-structured with clear navigation.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No visible security headers detected; security posture can be improved.
  5. No forms detected on the homepage; contact is via email and phone.
  6. Multiple reputable partners and sponsors are linked and displayed.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected, indicating privacy respect.
  8. Website uses WordPress CMS with standard plugins and jQuery.
  9. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design.
  10. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using standard themes and plugins, including jQuery and Gutena Lightbox. The HTML and CSS are valid and well-structured, supporting good SEO and mobile responsiveness. Performance is moderate, with no major blocking scripts detected. The site lacks advanced technical frameworks but is sufficient for its non-profit purpose. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. There is an opportunity to modernize by implementing progressive web app features, improving accessibility compliance, and optimizing loading times. Technical risks are low but include potential plugin vulnerabilities and missing security headers that could impact operational security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elimopava.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elimopava.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.