Skip to main content

Security report for elementfleet.com

Element Fleet Management · Transportation · Canada

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

87/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Element Fleet Management is a leading global fleet management company specializing in intelligent mobility solutions and comprehensive fleet services. The company serves a broad range of industries with a focus on optimizing fleet costs, safety, and productivity. With over 1.5 million vehicles under management and thousands of clients, Element holds a strong market position in North America and Australia/New Zealand. Their business model centers on providing end-to-end fleet lifecycle services including acquisition, management, optimization, and remarketing. Technically, the website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure utilizing modern JavaScript libraries, analytics tools, and video platforms. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, reflecting a high level of digital maturity. The use of multiple tracking and marketing tools indicates extensive user engagement monitoring, balanced with privacy compliance through clear policies and consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs reCAPTCHA for form security. However, it lacks visible security headers and a public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which are recommended for enhanced security posture. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration trust verification but does not detract from the overall legitimacy indicated by the website content and branding. Overall, Element Fleet Management presents a professional, trustworthy, and well-structured online presence suitable for its enterprise clientele. Strategic improvements in security transparency and WHOIS data availability would further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elementfleet.com

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
85
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
87

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention elementfleet.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
658
Employees
0
Customers
658
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
7%

66 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for elementfleet.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Element Fleet Management operates as a major player in the transportation sector, focusing on fleet management and intelligent mobility solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in their comprehensive service offerings, geographic reach, and strong client base. Revenue streams likely include leasing, fleet services, technology solutions, and advisory services. The target customers are fleet managers and businesses with vehicle fleets across various industries including healthcare, construction, energy, and government. The company maintains a robust partnership ecosystem with regional affiliates and global alliances. Their digital presence and content strategy indicate a focus on thought leadership and client engagement, supporting growth and market penetration.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA to protect forms. The presence of privacy and cookie policies aligned with GDPR indicates compliance awareness. However, the lack of security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms were found, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The extensive use of third-party scripts necessitates ongoing vulnerability management. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Establish and publicize an incident response contact or page to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to minimize exposure to known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance WHOIS data availability or transparency to improve domain registration trust and legitimacy verification.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Element Fleet Management Corporation
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Element Fleet Management
Description
Element is a global fleet management company offering intelligent mobility solutions, optimizing costs for cars, light vehicles, trucks, and MHE.
Key services
Fleet services, Fleet solutions, Electric vehicle services, Accident management, Fuel management, Maintenance management, Safety programs, Vehicle telematics, Remarketing, Sale leaseback
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Vidyard video player, YouTube Player API, reCAPTCHA, Vidyard Embed API, ACSB accessibility app
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Privacy and cookie policies present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, 6sense
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads Pixel, 6sense tracking
Marketing tools
Vidyard video analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong presence of fleet management services and solutions.
  3. Multiple social media and external links to reputable platforms.
  4. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools with privacy policies in place.
  5. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain registration trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Vidyard for video content. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for accessibility, with an ACSB accessibility app integrated. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDN-hosted libraries. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of documented security headers and incident response mechanisms indicates areas for modernization and risk mitigation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elementfleet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elementfleet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.