Skip to main content

Security report for ejadah.com

Ejadah · Real Estate · United Arab Emirates

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Email security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ejadah is a prominent asset management company based in the United Arab Emirates, specializing in real estate asset management and community solutions. The company serves a broad range of sectors including residential, retail, commercial, hospitality, and mixed-use developments. Their market position is strong within the UAE, supported by a large workforce and extensive managed property portfolio. The website reflects a professional business with clear service offerings such as facilities management, security management, and consultancy solutions. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform and leverages modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA for security and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and accessibility features, although some improvements in security headers and incident response information could enhance its posture. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and a public vulnerability disclosure policy. No WHOIS data was found for the domain, which raises questions about domain registration status, though the website content and client portfolio suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls. The overall risk assessment indicates a trustworthy and professional business website with minor gaps in domain registration transparency and security best practices. Strategic recommendations include adding security headers, publishing a security.txt file, and providing clear contact information for incident response to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ejadah.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ejadah operates as a key player in the UAE's real estate asset management sector, targeting a diverse client base across residential, commercial, retail, and hospitality industries. Their business model focuses on delivering comprehensive community solutions including facilities and security management. The company demonstrates strong market presence through numerous contracts and a large employee base. The extensive list of high-profile clients and partnerships underscores their competitive advantage and reputation. The website content and client logos indicate a mature organization with established revenue streams and a focus on quality service delivery. Growth indicators include a large managed area of over 132 million square feet and more than 1,200 contracts. The company appears to maintain a consistent branding strategy and leverages digital tools for marketing and analytics, supporting ongoing business development.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from automated abuse. Cookie consent is implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No public vulnerability disclosure or incident response contact information is available, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The lack of WHOIS data for the domain is a concern, potentially indicating a new or unregistered domain, which should be monitored. Overall, the site follows several best practices but could improve in security header implementation and incident response readiness to align with industry standards and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file or a vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Provide clear and accessible incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and improving GDPR-related disclosures.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ejadah
Description
Ejadah is a leading asset management company in Dubai with an outstanding reputation for its world-class real estate asset management services.
Key services
Facilities Management Solutions, Security Management Solutions, Security Consultancy Solutions, Real Estate Asset Management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Vimeo Player, WebFont Loader, CookieReports
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible new domain or privacy protection.
  3. Strong presence of client logos indicating established business relationships.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and implemented with consent mechanisms.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided content.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  8. No explicit incident response or security contact information found.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is developed using Webflow CMS, integrating modern web fonts via Google Fonts and embedding multimedia content through Vimeo. It employs Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and analytics, alongside Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site loads external scripts asynchronously to optimize performance. Cookie consent is managed via an embedded third-party script from CookieReports. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Performance is moderate with potential for improvement by optimizing external resource loading and implementing advanced caching strategies. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional web presence with room for security and performance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ejadah.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ejadah.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.