Skip to main content

Security report for eigenhuisenergieservice.nl

Vereniging Eigen Huis · Real Estate · Netherlands

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vereniging Eigen Huis is a well-established Dutch homeowners association dedicated to supporting individuals who want to buy or own a house. The organization focuses on sustainable and affordable homeownership, providing advocacy, information, and services to its members. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with a clear target audience of homeowners and prospective buyers in the Netherlands. The business model revolves around membership and providing value-added services to homeowners. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, with Chakra UI for styling, and integrates third-party tools like Visual Website Optimizer and Google Tag Manager for marketing and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, contributing to a good user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing X-XSS-Protection header

      Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

      What to do: Add "X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block"

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      DMARC not enforcing

      DMARC policy is set to "none"

      What to do: Gradually move to "quarantine" then "reject" policy

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

Keep watching eigenhuisenergieservice.nl

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention eigenhuisenergieservice.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for eigenhuisenergieservice.nl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a strong market position as a key player in the Dutch real estate sector, specifically targeting homeowners. Its competitive advantage lies in its focused advocacy and support services for sustainable homeownership. The business model is membership-based, likely generating revenue through subscriptions and service fees. The website's integration with marketing and analytics tools indicates an active approach to user engagement and growth. The absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies suggests an area for improvement in compliance and transparency. The company appears to maintain a consistent branding strategy and trustworthy online presence, supported by legitimate domain registration and alignment with its stated business purpose.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, including HSTS and Content Security Policy. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the provided content. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response information, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in transparency and readiness for security incidents. The use of third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate potential risks. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing security policies and incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement a visible security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Add contact details for a Data Protection Officer if applicable to enhance compliance.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and marketing tools for security vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vereniging Eigen Huis
Description
We zijn er voor iedereen die een huis wil kopen of bezit. Samen houden we eigenwoningbezit duurzaam en betaalbaar.
Key services
Homeowner support, Advocacy for sustainable and affordable homeownership, Information and news related to housing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Chakra UI, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
React, Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of consent management for Google Consent Mode

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Visual Website Optimizer
Marketing tools
Visual Website Optimizer
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found in the provided content.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  4. Security headers and HTTPS are properly implemented.
  5. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. Social media presence indicated via Twitter meta tags but no explicit links found.
  7. Use of third-party marketing and optimization tools detected.
  8. No evidence of security policy or incident response information publicly available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern technology stack including Next.js and React, providing server-side rendering and a responsive user interface. Chakra UI is used for consistent styling and accessibility. The site integrates with Visual Website Optimizer for A/B testing and Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a data-driven approach to optimization. Performance is moderate, with preloading of fonts and images to improve load times. The use of Kentico Kontent as a CMS suggests a headless content management approach. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to enhance compliance and security documentation. The infrastructure supports scalability and good user experience across devices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eigenhuisenergieservice.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eigenhuisenergieservice.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.