Skip to main content

Security report for eigenhuis.nl

Vereniging Eigen Huis · Real Estate · Netherlands

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vereniging Eigen Huis is a well-established Dutch non-profit organization dedicated to supporting homeowners and prospective buyers in the Netherlands. The website offers comprehensive resources including advice on buying, selling, financing, home maintenance, sustainability, and legal matters. With over 800,000 members, it holds a strong market position as a trusted advocate for homeowners. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies such as Next.js and Chakra UI, ensuring a fast, accessible, and mobile-optimized user experience. Security measures are robust, with HTTPS enforced and appropriate security headers in place, and no critical vulnerabilities detected. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site demonstrates a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and user-centric design.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing X-XSS-Protection header

      Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

      What to do: Add "X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block"

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      DMARC not enforcing

      DMARC policy is set to "none"

      What to do: Gradually move to "quarantine" then "reject" policy

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

Keep watching eigenhuis.nl

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention eigenhuis.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,729
Employees
46
Customers
2,674
Third parties
9
Weak passwords
9%

Latest record dated 2026-05-28 · 99 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for eigenhuis.nl.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –ehv-522.test.eigenhuis.nl2026-05-28
  • –ehv-499.test.eigenhuis.nl2026-05-28
  • –test.eigenhuis.nl2026-05-26
  • –ehv-496.test.eigenhuis.nl2026-05-12
  • –ehv-522.test.eigenhuis.nl2026-05-12

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a membership-based non-profit focusing on the real estate sector, specifically homeownership. Its business model revolves around providing expert advice, legal support, financial services, and sustainability guidance to its members. The extensive service catalog and localized advisory services indicate a broad and deep engagement with the Dutch housing market. The presence of multiple service detail pages and funnels for appointments suggests a mature digital engagement strategy. Partnerships with community platforms and employment sites enhance its ecosystem. The organization's longevity and large member base provide competitive advantages and market credibility.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of reputable third-party analytics and marketing tools is balanced with privacy considerations, including cookie consent mechanisms. No critical security issues or vulnerabilities were identified in the analysis. Incident response contact is available via a responsible disclosure page, though a dedicated security policy page is absent. Overall, the security measures align well with industry best practices for a large non-profit organization.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and user guidance.
  2. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
  4. Enhance incident response readiness by providing clear contact channels and response timelines.
  5. Continue improving privacy compliance by documenting data retention policies and user rights.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Vereniging Eigen Huis
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vereniging Eigen Huis
Description
We zijn er voor iedereen die een huis wil kopen of bezit. Samen houden we eigenwoningbezit duurzaam en betaalbaar.
Key services
Home buying advice, Mortgage advice, Home maintenance and repair services, Sustainability and energy saving guidance, Legal advice, Insurance services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Chakra UI, JavaScript, VWO (Visual Website Optimizer), Google Tag Manager, Convertexperiments, Expoints
Frameworks
Next.js, Chakra UI
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure forms
  • No known vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), VWO
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Convertexperiments, Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking pixels
VWO, Expoints
Marketing tools
VWO, Convertexperiments, Expoints
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Comprehensive and well-structured website with extensive content on home ownership, buying, selling, and sustainability.
  2. Strong focus on Dutch homeowners and related services.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and good security practices.
  4. Clear legal and privacy documentation available.
  5. Active social media presence and community engagement.
  6. No signs of blocking or WAF interference.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with Chakra UI for UI components, ensuring responsive and accessible design. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, VWO, and Convertexperiments for optimization and tracking. The content management system is Kentico Kontent, enabling structured content delivery and rich navigation. Performance is optimized with preloading of fonts and images, and deferred script loading. The site is well-structured with clear navigation hierarchies and comprehensive metadata for SEO. No significant technical debt or performance bottlenecks were observed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eigenhuis.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eigenhuis.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.