Skip to main content

Security report for eduard.com

EDUARD – MODEL ACCESSORIES ltd. · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eduard – Model Accessories ltd. operates a professional e-commerce website specializing in plastic model kits and related accessories such as decals, photoetched parts, and masks. The company targets hobbyists and collectors worldwide, offering a broad catalog of products with detailed descriptions and stock availability. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with active social media integration and customer support channels. Technically, the site uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and a specialized e-commerce platform (oXyShop), delivering a good user experience with mobile optimization and clear navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive policies and GDPR indicators. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, though the professional site and contact information mitigate this risk. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-managed but would benefit from enhanced transparency in domain registration and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eduard.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention eduard.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
934
Employees
0
Customers
934
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
21%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for eduard.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Eduard holds a strong position in the niche market of plastic model kits and accessories, leveraging an e-commerce business model focused on direct online sales. The company benefits from a loyal customer base of hobbyists and collectors, supported by a rich product catalog and regular news updates. Their partnership ecosystem includes hosting and e-commerce platform providers, with a clear focus on customer engagement through newsletters and social media. The business model is primarily retail with potential upselling through exclusive clubs and branded accessories. Growth indicators include frequent new product releases and an active online magazine. Strategic observations suggest maintaining domain registration transparency and expanding security disclosures to enhance customer trust.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be exploited. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency and readiness perception. The lack of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure program is another area for improvement. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and publishing security governance documents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and customer confidence.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program, including a security.txt file, to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure consistency and legitimacy, reducing potential trust concerns.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve usability for all users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
EDUARD – MODEL ACCESSORIES ltd.
VAT number
CZ44564325
Registration number
44564325
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EDUARD – MODEL ACCESSORIES ltd.
Description
International model on-line shop. Provides aircraft accessories and kits such as decals, photoetch parts and sprues.
Key services
Online sales of plastic model kits, Accessories including decals, photoetched parts, masks, Brassin and other branded model accessories, Newsletter and online magazine, Customer support and helpdesk
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, Fancybox, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, TermsFeed Cookie Consent
Frameworks
oXyShop X5 (e-commerce platform)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure login and account forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
TermsFeed Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform specializing in plastic model kits and accessories.
  2. Content is rich with product listings, news, and support information.
  3. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and warrants caution.
  5. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  6. Uses modern web technologies and tracking tools responsibly.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected.
  8. Contact information is clearly provided including phone numbers and physical address.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the oXyShop e-commerce platform, utilizing a combination of JavaScript libraries including jQuery, jQuery UI, Fancybox, and Slick Carousel for UI components and interactivity. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking and analytics, complemented by Facebook Pixel for marketing and retargeting. The site is hosted with CDN support from eduard-cdn.oxyshop.cloud, likely provided by the platform vendor oXy Online. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices evident through meta tags and structured navigation. Some technical debt is indicated by legacy IE conditional styles and older jQuery versions, suggesting opportunities for modernization. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional e-commerce experience but could benefit from updates to libraries and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eduard.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eduard.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.