Skip to main content

Security report for edenprojects.org

Eden: People+Planet · Non-profit · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eden: People+Planet is a newly established environmental and social advocacy organization, launched in early 2024. The website serves as a platform to promote sustainability initiatives and community engagement. The organization appears to be small and focused on niche advocacy efforts. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, hosted behind Cloudflare, and employs standard plugins such as Yoast SEO and Cookie Law Info for compliance and SEO. Performance and mobile optimization are moderate to good, with basic accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no visible privacy or terms of service policies. Business credibility is moderate due to the lack of explicit contact information and trust signals. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from improved security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching edenprojects.org

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
83
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization targets environmentally conscious individuals and communities interested in sustainability and social justice. Its business model aligns with non-profit advocacy, likely relying on donations, grants, or volunteer support. Market positioning is niche with a focus on people and planet issues. The website content quality is good, supporting clear messaging and engagement. The technical infrastructure is standard for small non-profits, leveraging WordPress and Cloudflare for hosting and security. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data. Growth potential depends on expanding outreach and trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS hosting, which provides baseline security. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces resilience against DNS spoofing and clickjacking attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which limits transparency and preparedness. The cookie consent mechanism indicates some GDPR awareness, but lack of a privacy policy is a compliance gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but can be improved with standard best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate security readiness.
  5. Include clear contact information and trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eden: People+Planet
Description
Eden: People+Planet appears to be a non-profit or advocacy organization focused on environmental and social issues, promoting sustainability and community engagement.
Key services
Environmental advocacy, Community engagement, Sustainability initiatives
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Cloudflare, Google Fonts, Yoast SEO, Cookie Law Info Plugin, Google Site Kit
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Client Transfer Prohibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Site Kit)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Tag Manager (gtag.js)
Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a recently launched environmental advocacy platform.
  2. Uses WordPress with Divi theme and standard plugins.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage HTML.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Cookie Law Info plugin.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  8. SSL is enabled but DNSSEC is not configured.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme, a popular and flexible CMS platform. It uses Cloudflare for DNS and hosting, which provides performance and security benefits. Google Fonts and Google Site Kit are integrated for typography and analytics. The site employs lazy loading scripts for performance optimization. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin. Performance is moderate with some optimization evident but could be improved further. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small non-profit website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 64/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with edenprojects.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review edenprojects.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.