Skip to main content

Security report for ecoveganimals.org

EcoVegAnimals · Non-profit · Bosnia and Herzegovina

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EcoVegAnimals is a small non-profit organization based in Bosnia and Herzegovina focused on animal rights and environmental protection. The website is professionally designed using Squarespace, featuring clear navigation and consistent branding. Key services include advocacy campaigns such as Chicken Revolution and BiH Against Fur, targeting animal rights activists and environmentally conscious audiences. The organization maintains partnerships with recognized entities like PETA and V-Label, enhancing its credibility. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies and is mobile optimized, though performance is moderate. Security posture is good with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, but lacks DNSSEC and some security headers. Privacy compliance is limited due to missing privacy policy and terms of service pages, though a cookie consent banner is present. Contact information is not explicitly provided on the site, which may impact user trust. Overall, the site is trustworthy and functional but could improve compliance and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ecoveganimals.org

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization positions itself as a regional non-profit advocating for animal rights and environmental issues. Its business model relies on awareness campaigns and partnerships with international organizations. The website reflects a focused target audience of activists and the general public interested in veganism and cruelty-free lifestyles. The presence of partner logos and social media links indicates an active engagement strategy. The domain age and WHOIS data align with the organization's recent founding in 2022. No commercial or revenue-generating features are evident, consistent with a non-profit model.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with HSTS, indicating a baseline secure configuration. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS spoofing risks. Security headers beyond HSTS are not evident, suggesting room for improvement in mitigating clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and XSS risks. No incident response or security policy information is available, limiting transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML. The absence of contact emails or security contacts reduces incident reporting capabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional headers, DNSSEC, and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Add a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security inquiries.
  5. Consider publishing an incident response or security policy page to enhance transparency and preparedness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EcoVegAnimals
Description
Non-profit organization focused on animal rights and environmental protection in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Key services
Animal rights advocacy, Environmental protection campaigns, Public awareness and education, Campaigns such as Chicken Revolution, BiH Against Fur, Cruelty Free, V-Label
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace, jQuery, Google Fonts
Platforms
Squarespace CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Squarespace with a professional and consistent design.
  2. Content is focused on animal rights and environmental protection in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Cookie banner is present with consent mechanism.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. Social media links are present and active.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  8. Security headers are minimal but HSTS is enabled.
  9. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Squarespace, leveraging its CMS and hosting infrastructure. It uses jQuery and Google Fonts, with no heavy or outdated libraries detected. The site is mobile optimized and has a clean, consistent design. Performance is moderate, likely due to standard Squarespace hosting and image assets. SEO is basic with proper meta tags and Open Graph data but lacks advanced SEO features. Accessibility is basic with no explicit ARIA roles or landmarks detected. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating minimal user tracking. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ecoveganimals.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ecoveganimals.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.