Skip to main content

Security report for eckeroline.fi

Rederiaktiebolaget Eckerö · Transportation · Finland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rederiaktiebolaget Eckerö operates the Eckerö Line ferry service, providing daily passenger and cargo transport between Helsinki, Finland, and Tallinn, Estonia. The company offers a range of travel-related services including hotel packages, pre-order shopping for ferry passengers, and group travel options. The website is well-structured, professionally designed, and targets Finnish and Baltic travelers as well as cargo customers. It maintains a strong market position as a reputable ferry operator in the Baltic Sea region. Technically, the site is built on Magento 2 with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms, although dedicated security policies and incident response contacts are not published. Overall, the site is mature, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eckeroline.fi

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention eckeroline.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,080
Employees
0
Customers
1,056
Third parties
24
Weak passwords
18%

5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for eckeroline.fi.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company leverages a multi-channel approach with localized websites for Finland, Estonia, and international customers. Revenue streams include passenger ticket sales, cargo shipping, onboard shopping, and travel packages. The business model focuses on transportation and hospitality services in the Baltic region. The presence of a loyalty program (S-Etukortti) and pre-order shopping indicates customer engagement strategies. Partnerships and sister sites extend market reach. The company’s long history and consistent WHOIS data reinforce its credibility. Growth indicators include active blog/news updates and mobile app availability.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, use of security headers such as HSTS, CSP, and X-Frame-Options, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response information, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and preparedness visibility. The site should consider publishing these to enhance trust and readiness. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be improved with formal documentation and contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, such as a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with WCAG standards.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Rederiaktiebolaget Eckerö
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rederiaktiebolaget Eckerö
Description
Eckerö Line tarjoaa risteilyjä suomalaisella m/s Finlandialla Helsingistä Tallinnaan, sisältäen laivamatkat, hotellipaketit, pre-order ostokset ja ryhmämatkat.
Key services
Passenger ferry services Helsinki-Tallinn, Hotel packages, Pre-order shopping, Cargo shipping, Group and event travel
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Magento 2, RequireJS, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics 4, FontAwesome, Flatpickr, Uppy
Frameworks
Magento
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Finnish with multi-language options.
  3. Strong focus on ferry travel services between Helsinki and Tallinn.
  4. Comprehensive navigation with detailed service categories.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected.
  9. Contact information is clearly provided including phone and physical addresses.
  10. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest, and LinkedIn.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Magento 2 as its CMS platform, leveraging RequireJS for JavaScript module loading, jQuery, and various UI libraries like Flatpickr and Uppy. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics 4 are integrated for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized with responsive CSS and preloaded fonts for performance. SEO is supported with meta tags, canonical links, and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The technical stack is modern and supports a robust e-commerce and booking experience, though continuous monitoring and updates are recommended to maintain security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eckeroline.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eckeroline.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.