Security report for eblgroup.co.uk
EBL Group · Real Estate · United Kingdom
EBL Group is a UK-based construction and property development company with over 30 years of experience, specializing in roofing, construction, insurance repairs, and residential development. The company serves commercial and residential clients primarily in the North West of England but also operates nationally for blue-chip clients. Their website reflects a professional business with clear service offerings, multiple industry certifications, and a focus on health and safety. Technically, the website uses CMS Made Simple with common web technologies such as jQuery and Google Analytics, but some components like jQuery are outdated, posing potential security risks. The site includes a cookie consent mechanism and a basic data protection policy, indicating some privacy compliance. Security posture is moderate with no visible security headers and no public incident response or security policies. WHOIS data for the domain 'www.eblgroup.co.uk' is unavailable due to domain naming rules, but the website is accessible and legitimate. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve technical and security aspects.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- GDPR outside view
- 65/ 100 · Medium
- Checks completed
- 6of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
- (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
- (b) Incident handling: One indicator
- (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
- (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
- (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
- (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
- (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
- (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
- (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
- (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
- High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
- GDPR Art. 12
- GDPR Art. 13
- NIST PT-5: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 PT-5: Privacy Notice
- High
Third-party services without privacy policy
Detected services: Google Analytics, Cloudflare, Google APIs
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
- High
Email security
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
- High
Weak DKIM Key
DKIM selector 'default' uses 32-bit key
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA keys for DKIM
- High
Weak DKIM Key
DKIM selector 'google' uses 32-bit key
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA keys for DKIM
- High
Weak DKIM Key
DKIM selector 'k1' uses 32-bit key
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA keys for DKIM
- High
Weak DKIM Key
DKIM selector 'k2' uses 32-bit key
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA keys for DKIM
- High
Weak DKIM Key
DKIM selector 'mail' uses 32-bit key
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA keys for DKIM
- High
Weak DKIM Key
DKIM selector 'email' uses 32-bit key
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA keys for DKIM
- High
Weak DKIM Key
DKIM selector 'dkim' uses 32-bit key
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA keys for DKIM
- High
Weak DKIM Key
DKIM selector 's1' uses 32-bit key
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA keys for DKIM
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching eblgroup.co.uk
This scan found 22 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 47
- Email security
- 10
- DNS health
- 70
- Network security
- 20
- GDPR outside view
- 65
- Average
- 42
Not counted
- Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Update jQuery and other third-party libraries to current secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
- Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
- Publish detailed security and incident response policies accessible to users and partners.
- Enhance privacy compliance by expanding the data protection policy and providing DPO contact information.
- Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience and SEO.
Contact details published on the site
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- EBL Group
- Description
- EBL Group provides a wide range of services including Construction, Development, Insurance work and Roofing. They have been trading for over 30 years with a strong customer base in the North West UK and operate nationally for blue-chip companies. They emphasize health & safety, quality, and continuous improvement.
- Key services
- Commercial and Industrial Roofing, Construction projects including school refurbishments and restorations, Insurance repairs for storm, flood, fire, subsidence, and accidental damage, Residential property development
- Content quality
- good
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- jQuery 1.11.1, Nivo Slider, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, CookieConsent2, Fonts.net (Neue Helvetica W01 font)
- Performance
- moderate
- Mobile
- basic
- Accessibility
- basic
- SEO
- basic
Security
- Observed score
- 60/100
- Good practices seen
- Cookie consent banner implemented
- No visible exposed sensitive data
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
- Tracking level
- moderate
- Privacy practices
- basic
Advertising
- Transparency
- basic
Site quality
- Design
- good
- User experience
- good
- Content relevance
- good
- Navigation
- good
- Professionalism
- good
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
- No WAF or blocking detected
- WHOIS data unavailable due to domain naming error
- Cookie consent implemented with clear messaging
- Multiple industry certifications displayed
- Contact information is clear and consistent
- Use of outdated jQuery version is a security concern
- No visible security headers detected
- No privacy or incident response policies publicly detailed beyond data protection policy
- No social media links found in the provided content
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with eblgroup.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eblgroup.co.uk.