Skip to main content

Security report for ebgulbuves.lv

SIA “EB Guļbūves” · Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EB Guļbūves is a small Latvian company specializing in handcrafted ecological wooden log houses, sauna buildings, and log house frames. Their business model focuses on direct custom construction services targeting individuals and families seeking sustainable and warm wooden homes. The website is hosted on WordPress.com, utilizing modern Gutenberg blocks and Jetpack plugins, with good mobile optimization and accessibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and secure forms, though lacking advanced security headers and formal privacy policies. The company provides clear contact information and demonstrates trustworthiness through visible registration and banking details. Overall, the site presents a professional and credible digital presence for a niche real estate construction business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ebgulbuves.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company occupies a niche market in Latvia for sustainable wooden homes, leveraging handcrafted quality and ecological materials as competitive advantages. Their services include residential log homes, sauna houses, and customizable log house frames. Revenue likely derives from direct sales and construction contracts. The target market is environmentally conscious homeowners valuing natural materials and customization. The website supports lead generation via contact forms and subscription signups. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram supports marketing efforts. No evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries was found. The company appears focused on organic growth within a local market segment.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and uses secure form submission with nonce tokens, indicating good baseline security practices. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, representing a compliance gap especially under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business website but could be enhanced with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to enhance web security.
  3. Create a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing incident response contact information and data retention policies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA “EB Guļbūves”
Registration number
40203610738
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA “EB Guļbūves”
Description
EB Guļbūves offers handcrafted massive wooden log houses with ecological and sustainable construction, providing warm, natural homes with healthy microclimates. They specialize in residential log buildings, sauna houses, and log house frames, emphasizing customization and natural materials.
Key services
Guļbaļķu dzīvojamās ēkas (Log residential buildings), Guļbaļķu Pirts Ēkas (Log sauna houses), Guļbaļķu Karkasi (Log house frames), Free consultation services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gutenberg Blocks, Jetpack, Google Analytics, Twemoji
Frameworks
WordPress Block Editor
Platforms
WordPress.com Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with nonce tokens

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, WordPress.com Stats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
WordPress.com Stats
Marketing tools
Jetpack Subscriptions
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress.com hosted site with good content and structure
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address
  4. No security.txt or incident response info available
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error
  6. No signs of WAF or content blocking
  7. Uses Google Analytics and WordPress.com stats for tracking
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress.com platform using the Gutenberg block editor and Jetpack plugin suite. It leverages modern web fonts and emoji support via Twemoji. Google Analytics and WordPress.com stats are used for visitor tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility features such as skip links and semantic HTML. Performance is moderate, typical for WordPress.com hosted sites. No broken elements or errors were detected. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, suitable for a small business informational site. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ebgulbuves.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ebgulbuves.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.