Skip to main content

Security report for eaq.ee

MTÜ Eesti Kvaliteediühing · Non-profit · Estonia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MTÜ Eesti Kvaliteediühing is a non-profit organization based in Estonia focused on uniting organizations and individuals dedicated to development and quality improvement. The website serves as a platform for sharing news, events, and international quality-related activities, targeting quality professionals and organizations. The business model centers on membership and community engagement within the quality sector. The organization appears established with a domain age consistent with its founding year of 2018 and maintains a moderate market position within Estonia's quality community. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.5.5 using the Avada theme and integrates popular plugins such as Yoast SEO and CleanTalk anti-spam. It employs modern web technologies including jQuery and Font Awesome, and uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is served over HTTPS, indicating a secure transport layer, and shows moderate performance and good mobile optimization. SEO practices are implemented with meta tags and structured data, although accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and anti-spam measures but lacks explicit security headers and documented security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, which is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, limiting transparency in security management. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid business credibility and technical foundation but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security policy transparency. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, enhancing security headers, and publishing incident response contacts to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eaq.ee

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a non-profit quality association in Estonia, focusing on connecting development-oriented organizations and individuals. Its competitive advantage lies in its established presence since 2018 and active engagement in international quality events. Revenue streams likely derive from membership fees and event participation. The target customers are quality professionals and organizations seeking development and networking opportunities. The website reflects a consistent branding strategy and leverages social media channels for outreach. Growth indicators include regular event updates and international collaborations. The partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms but no explicit business partners were identified in the content.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is moderate, with HTTPS enforced and anti-spam protection via CleanTalk. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No exposed credentials or vulnerabilities were found, indicating good hygiene. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which are critical under GDPR. Incident response readiness is unclear due to lack of contact information for security issues. The security culture appears basic but functional, with room for improvement in transparency and policy documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to enhance security posture.
  3. Establish and disclose incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security assessments to maintain and improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MTÜ Eesti Kvaliteediühing
Description
Ühendame arengule suunatud organisatsioone ja inimesi
Key services
Organizing events, Providing quality-related news and updates, International event participation, Membership services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.5.5, PHP, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Analytics, Font Awesome 5.15.4, Yoast SEO plugin, CleanTalk Anti-Spam plugin, Avada Theme 7.6.1
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of anti-spam plugin (CleanTalk)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a non-profit quality association based in Estonia
  2. Content is primarily in Estonian with English alternate language available
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the analyzed content
  4. Use of modern WordPress CMS with popular plugins and themes
  5. HTTPS is enabled with Google Analytics and CleanTalk anti-spam integration
  6. No visible security incident response or vulnerability disclosure information
  7. Social media presence includes Facebook, Twitter (x.com), and LinkedIn
  8. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected in HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with the Avada theme and integrates widely used plugins like Yoast SEO and CleanTalk anti-spam. It employs jQuery and Font Awesome for UI elements and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured JSON-LD data. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of some security headers and privacy compliance features indicates areas for modernization and risk mitigation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eaq.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eaq.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.