Skip to main content

Security report for eans.ee

Lennuliiklusteeninduse AS · Transportation · Estonia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lennuliiklusteeninduse AS operates as the national air navigation service provider in Estonia, ensuring safe and efficient air traffic management within Estonian and European airspace. The organization offers core services including air traffic control, aeronautical information services, technical system management, and ongoing development activities to modernize aviation infrastructure. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on Drupal 10, with multilingual support and integration of modern APIs such as Google Maps and Facebook SDK for enhanced user engagement. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms, although explicit security policies and incident response details are not publicly disclosed. Overall, the domain registration and website content align well, indicating a trustworthy and established entity in the transportation sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eans.ee

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
40
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strategic position as Estonia's official air navigation service provider, collaborating with international aviation organizations such as Borealis Alliance, CANSO, and IFATCA. Its business model is government-affiliated, focusing on public service delivery rather than commercial profit. The website targets aviation professionals, drone operators, and the general public interested in aviation safety and information. The presence of detailed reports, pricing, and cooperation pages suggests transparency and stakeholder engagement. The company demonstrates growth through technological upgrades and partnerships, positioning itself as a key player in European air traffic management.

Security posture

The website employs standard security best practices including HTTPS, modern security headers, and GDPR-compliant cookie management. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided HTML content. However, the absence of a public security policy or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency. Incident response contact channels are not explicitly provided, which could be improved to enhance trust and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is good for a government-related entity, but further enhancements in policy disclosure and incident communication are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader compliance.
  4. Provide explicit incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Lennuliiklusteeninduse AS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lennuliiklusteeninduse AS
Description
Riiklik lennuliikluse korraldaja Eestis, kes tagab turvalise ja nutika teejuhi Eesti ja Euroopa taevas. Pakub lennujuhtimise teenuseid, lennundusteavet, tehnika haldust ning arendustegevusi lennunduse valdkonnas.
Key services
Lennujuhtimine, Lennundusteave, Tehnika haldus, Arendustegevused, Mehitamata lennundus
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google Maps API, Facebook SDK
Frameworks
Drupal CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of EU cookie compliance script with consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML
  • Secure forms with CSRF tokens (implied by Drupal)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and maintained using Drupal 10.
  2. Content is primarily in Estonian with English language option.
  3. Strong focus on aviation safety, air traffic management, and technological development.
  4. Presence of EU cookie compliance and privacy policies indicates GDPR awareness.
  5. No critical security issues or WAF blocking detected.
  6. Use of reputable external partners and industry organizations.
  7. No direct phone numbers or emails explicitly labeled in the HTML content provided.
  8. Contact forms are present for user communication.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, indicating a modern and supported CMS platform. Integration with Google Maps API and Facebook SDK shows digital maturity and user engagement focus. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization especially in image handling and script loading. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring usability across devices. SEO practices are evident through meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks are minimal but include dependency on third-party scripts and potential accessibility gaps. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with opportunities for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eans.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eans.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.