Skip to main content

Security report for e-l-m.com

e-l-m Kragelund A/S · Transportation · Denmark

High risk. 4 critical or high findings in Network security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

e-l-m Kragelund A/S is a Danish company specializing in handling equipment and attachments for forklifts, targeting professional and business customers in the transportation sector. The website presents a professional image with clear branding and offers product catalogues and a capacity calculator to support customer needs. The digital infrastructure is built on WordPress with Elementor and WooCommerce, indicating a mature e-commerce presence. The site employs modern technologies including Cookiebot for cookie consent management and Google Analytics for traffic analysis, with consent-based tracking to comply with privacy regulations. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and no immediate vulnerabilities detected, though improvements such as enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers are recommended. Privacy compliance is partially met with a cookie policy and consent mechanism, but lacks a clearly accessible privacy policy and terms of service. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and trustworthy, with room for enhanced transparency and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 29 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching e-l-m.com

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
90
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
100
Average
72
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, focusing on forklift equipment and attachments, serving a B2B market. Founded in 1996, the domain age supports a well-established business. The business model revolves around product sales and service provision, supported by an online catalogue and capacity calculator. The website's use of WooCommerce suggests direct sales or lead generation capabilities. The absence of explicit contact details online may indicate a preference for direct business relationships or offline communication channels. The company leverages Google Analytics and Cookiebot, reflecting awareness of digital marketing and privacy compliance. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly linked via the website content. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and targets professional customers requiring specialized forklift equipment.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Cookie consent is actively managed via Cookiebot, enhancing GDPR compliance. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended DNS security enhancement. Security headers beyond HTTPS are not explicitly detected, suggesting potential for improvement in headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, which could improve incident response readiness. The site uses common WordPress plugins and themes, which require regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be strengthened with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy accessible from the website footer or main menu.
  3. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  4. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve incident response.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
e-l-m Kragelund A/S
Description
We are your professional partner in handling equipment and attachments for forklifts. We prioritize delivering high-quality equipment and services.
Key services
Handling equipment, Attachments for forklifts, Capacity calculator, Product catalogue
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, WooCommerce, Elementor, Jet Plugins, Cookiebot, Google Analytics, WP Rocket
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Elementor and WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality
  2. Cookie consent is managed by Cookiebot with detailed cookie declarations
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the scanned content
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  5. Website is well-branded with consistent logo and metadata
  6. Google Analytics is used with consent-based loading
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It uses jQuery and various Jet plugins for enhanced UI features. Cookiebot manages cookie consent with detailed cookie declarations, and Google Analytics is integrated with consent-based loading. The site is hosted with a registrar Key-Systems GmbH and uses simply.com for DNS. Performance is moderate with caching via WP Rocket. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data are properly implemented. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though enabling DNSSEC and additional security headers would further improve robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with e-l-m.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review e-l-m.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.